‎/Transcript - 20260418-Ancient Greek Intensive Course - Part 10
[search]
 SomaLibrary
 signin

Transcript: 20260418-Ancient Greek Intensive Course - Part 10

Watch on YouTube  |  Readable transcript  |  Language: en
Show concatenated view
265 timestamped sections using the same paragraph analysis.
Section 1: 00:00:50,910 – 00:01:16,870
00:00:50,910 → 00:00:50,920 >> All right. I'm sorry I'm so late. God.
00:00:50,920 → 00:00:52,630 That was a little took me too long. I
00:00:52,640 → 00:00:54,110 apologize.
00:00:54,120 → 00:00:56,550 You there, Madalena?
00:00:56,560 → 00:00:58,630 I'm here.
00:00:58,640 → 00:01:01,230 All right, floor is yours. I know you're
00:01:01,240 → 00:01:02,910 tired. I'm
00:01:02,920 → 00:01:05,189 I'm late. So,
00:01:05,199 → 00:01:07,110 you just do whatever you're going to do
00:01:07,120 → 00:01:08,830 to teach me this material. I've got my
00:01:08,840 → 00:01:10,590 textbook in front of me.
00:01:10,600 → 00:01:12,630 And I'm going to leave it to you.
00:01:12,640 → 00:01:16,870 Yes. Okay. Well,
Section 2: 00:01:16,880 – 00:01:22,750
00:01:16,880 → 00:01:22,750 story time for us all.
Section 3: 00:01:29,590 – 00:01:36,230
00:01:29,600 → 00:01:33,001 So, page 203.
00:01:33,011 → 00:01:36,230 >> [clears throat]
Section 4: 00:01:39,590 – 00:02:05,550
00:01:39,590 → 00:01:39,600 >> We have nouns and verbs.
00:01:39,600 → 00:01:42,350 And nouns are things, places, people.
00:01:42,360 → 00:01:44,710 Verbs are actions.
00:01:44,720 → 00:01:48,190 And participles are verbs
00:01:48,200 → 00:01:52,830 that act like an adjective.
00:01:52,840 → 00:01:57,550 They act like a a descriptive word.
00:02:00,760 → 00:02:05,550 they they participate in both worlds.
Section 5: 00:02:05,560 – 00:02:16,550
00:02:08,160 → 00:02:13,830 entangles both being and action. And so,
Section 6: 00:02:19,590 – 00:02:33,630
00:02:19,590 → 00:02:19,600 But below where it says on the first
00:02:21,040 → 00:02:23,430 their nature is shown by the fact they
00:02:23,440 → 00:02:25,630 have gender, number, and case.
00:02:25,640 → 00:02:28,590 And they can modify and agree with nouns
00:02:28,600 → 00:02:30,070 and pronouns.
Section 7: 00:02:36,150 – 00:02:56,510
00:02:36,150 → 00:02:36,160 it says there's active, middle, and
00:02:36,160 → 00:02:39,110 passive participles of present, future,
00:02:39,120 → 00:02:42,310 aorist, and perfect tenses.
00:02:42,320 → 00:02:45,830 Each of these has a masculine, feminine,
00:02:45,840 → 00:02:47,510 and neuter.
00:02:47,520 → 00:02:50,230 So, we're going to look at
00:02:51,960 → 00:02:56,510 the tenses of the participle
Section 8: 00:02:56,520 – 00:03:23,270
00:02:58,000 → 00:03:00,750 look at the relationship between it and
00:03:00,760 → 00:03:05,230 the verb. So, first is the perfect.
00:03:05,240 → 00:03:06,670 Let me interrupt for a second. Let me
00:03:06,680 → 00:03:08,590 interrupt and ask you a question.
00:03:09,680 → 00:03:11,790 Could you just tell me
00:03:11,800 → 00:03:14,590 in like one sentence or two sentences
00:03:14,600 → 00:03:17,270 what a participle is?
00:03:17,280 → 00:03:20,430 Um it's a it's a verb that acts like an
00:03:20,440 → 00:03:23,270 adjective, right? So,
Section 9: 00:03:23,280 – 00:03:57,070
00:03:23,280 → 00:03:26,070 uh it's um
00:03:26,080 → 00:03:28,270 like I just like a descriptive word,
00:03:28,280 → 00:03:32,190 kind of like the the running man. The
00:03:32,200 → 00:03:34,630 running would be describing
00:03:34,640 → 00:03:36,830 the noun, right?
00:03:36,840 → 00:03:38,070 There you go. That's what I wanted. It
00:03:38,080 → 00:03:39,870 seems like it's Okay.
00:03:39,880 → 00:03:41,150 >> That's what I wanted. I want to make
00:03:41,160 → 00:03:43,110 sure that you had an example in your
00:03:43,120 → 00:03:45,630 head or could produce an example in your
00:03:45,640 → 00:03:47,670 head of that actual participle, which is
00:03:47,680 → 00:03:50,470 running. Bingo. Keep going.
00:03:50,480 → 00:03:52,310 >> Okay.
00:03:52,320 → 00:03:57,070 So, the the present is continuous
Section 10: 00:03:57,080 – 00:04:20,030
00:03:57,080 → 00:04:00,590 continuous action and it becomes
00:04:00,600 → 00:04:02,510 the action
00:04:04,320 → 00:04:07,750 in similarity to the main verb in the
00:04:07,760 → 00:04:11,070 sentence, like um educating.
00:04:11,080 → 00:04:12,990 Then future is action with a
00:04:13,000 → 00:04:15,670 destination, so showing what's about to
Section 11: 00:04:22,430 – 00:04:39,550
00:04:22,430 → 00:04:22,440 It says always indicates subsequent
00:04:25,040 → 00:04:29,150 and usually expresses intent or purpose.
00:04:29,160 → 00:04:32,870 Um so, it's talking about you're about
00:04:32,880 → 00:04:39,550 to do something or intending to educate.
Section 12: 00:04:41,750 – 00:05:04,870
00:04:41,760 → 00:04:43,990 So, we should be concerned about the
00:04:45,840 → 00:04:48,750 of this participle. Is it taking place
00:04:48,760 → 00:04:51,190 at the same time as the main verb? If it
00:04:51,200 → 00:04:53,350 is, it's present.
00:04:53,360 → 00:04:57,150 Is it taking place at a subsequent time?
00:04:57,160 → 00:04:59,510 Then it's the future.
00:04:59,520 → 00:05:01,790 Right? What about the aorist? Look, it
00:05:01,800 → 00:05:04,870 says sometimes simultaneous.
Section 13: 00:05:04,880 – 00:05:39,990
00:05:04,880 → 00:05:08,310 Right? Often prior to.
00:05:08,320 → 00:05:11,150 Prior to the aorist is acting prior to
00:05:11,160 → 00:05:13,950 the main verb. That's I know it sounds
00:05:13,960 → 00:05:15,470 weird, like why the hell do I even need
00:05:15,480 → 00:05:17,070 to know that? Cuz you can't translate
00:05:17,080 → 00:05:19,630 these things if you don't understand
00:05:19,640 → 00:05:22,870 those where the participle stands in
00:05:24,120 → 00:05:26,070 If you get a participle with your main
00:05:26,080 → 00:05:27,830 verb that's in the present, know that
00:05:27,840 → 00:05:30,350 it's going to be the same time.
00:05:30,360 → 00:05:31,790 Future, know that it's going to be
00:05:31,800 → 00:05:33,830 subsequent. It's going to be future.
00:05:33,840 → 00:05:36,350 Right? Aorist, it's going to be most of
00:05:36,360 → 00:05:39,990 the time time before, but then sometimes
Section 14: 00:05:40,000 – 00:06:11,590
00:05:40,000 → 00:05:42,110 it's the same time as. So, you just have
00:05:42,120 → 00:05:43,990 to tell from context.
00:05:44,000 → 00:05:45,950 Yeah. Perfect. Okay, sorry. I'm going to
00:05:45,960 → 00:05:47,150 let you continue.
00:05:47,160 → 00:05:49,310 Oh, no, you're good.
00:05:49,320 → 00:05:53,550 Um so, yeah. Aorist is completed action.
00:05:53,560 → 00:05:55,950 Um unconcerned with timing, but noting
00:05:55,960 → 00:05:59,430 an action has occurred. Um for example,
00:05:59,440 → 00:06:01,470 having come to the city.
00:06:01,480 → 00:06:04,190 Um coming to the city after
00:06:04,200 → 00:06:06,230 uh coming to the city. Laughing once and
00:06:06,240 → 00:06:09,830 for all with a laugh. So,
Section 15: 00:06:11,600 – 00:06:18,470
Section 16: 00:06:20,110 – 00:06:23,630
00:06:20,110 → 00:06:20,120 Below it says
Section 17: 00:06:27,110 – 00:06:48,510
00:06:27,110 → 00:06:27,120 Yeah, so the aorist would have been uh
00:06:27,120 → 00:06:29,630 something that's already happened. So,
00:06:29,640 → 00:06:31,790 the perfect
00:06:31,800 → 00:06:34,350 stresses the completion of the action.
00:06:35,440 → 00:06:39,750 it but it also has an ongoing result.
00:06:41,400 → 00:06:43,510 it it's almost like it has a
00:06:43,520 → 00:06:45,190 consequence.
Section 18: 00:06:48,520 – 00:07:12,430
00:06:48,520 → 00:06:50,750 Yeah, so showing something that's been
00:06:50,760 → 00:06:54,070 done, like having educated.
00:06:54,080 → 00:06:56,910 Um yeah, having educated for oneself,
00:06:56,920 → 00:06:59,270 having been educated.
00:06:59,680 → 00:07:03,190 >> Good. Do you understand that?
00:07:03,200 → 00:07:07,150 I I think so. Yeah. Good. Good. So,
00:07:07,160 → 00:07:09,270 conceptually you understand what's going
00:07:09,280 → 00:07:10,590 on. Good.
Section 19: 00:07:12,440 – 00:07:42,630
00:07:12,440 → 00:07:14,150 The three
00:07:14,160 → 00:07:17,790 the three bold words
00:07:17,800 → 00:07:19,150 in the next paragraph.
00:07:19,160 → 00:07:21,150 >> Yeah. The attributive, circumstantial,
00:07:21,160 → 00:07:22,750 and supplementary. That Those are the
00:07:22,760 → 00:07:24,390 terms that we're going to be using for
00:07:24,400 → 00:07:25,870 participles
00:07:25,880 → 00:07:27,630 all the time.
00:07:27,640 → 00:07:30,390 So, I want you to be, you know,
00:07:30,400 → 00:07:32,190 participles are kind of an art and you
00:07:32,200 → 00:07:33,750 kind of have to remember, oh, is this
00:07:33,760 → 00:07:36,670 thing just an attribute, you know? Is it
00:07:36,680 → 00:07:39,070 just describing something? Is it trying
00:07:39,080 → 00:07:42,630 to communicate the circumstances?
Section 20: 00:07:42,640 – 00:08:20,110
00:07:42,640 → 00:07:44,790 Or is it just supplementing? [snorts]
00:07:44,800 → 00:07:46,990 When I say circumstances, I mean like
00:07:47,000 → 00:07:49,550 this participles will be used and Galen
00:07:49,560 → 00:07:52,030 does this a lot. Participles will be
00:07:52,040 → 00:07:53,950 used to kind of
00:07:53,960 → 00:07:57,350 preface the verb to tell you everything
00:07:57,360 → 00:08:00,670 that's built up to the verb. Right? So,
00:08:01,680 → 00:08:03,750 they're really, you know, it's it's hard
00:08:03,760 → 00:08:05,630 to look at this and
00:08:05,640 → 00:08:08,470 you know, anyway, keep going. Keep
00:08:08,480 → 00:08:11,070 going. It looks like we've got some uh
00:08:11,080 → 00:08:12,790 uh morphology to consider, huh?
00:08:12,800 → 00:08:16,990 >> Yeah. Yeah, so I wrote um I know about
00:08:17,000 → 00:08:20,110 about the difference between attributive
Section 21: 00:08:20,120 – 00:08:43,310
00:08:21,080 → 00:08:23,390 um circumstantial
00:08:23,400 → 00:08:26,870 is that the the attributive uh describes
00:08:28,240 → 00:08:31,510 uh such as um
00:08:31,520 → 00:08:33,750 the sleeping dog.
00:08:35,000 → 00:08:36,830 you know, which which dog is the
00:08:36,840 → 00:08:39,430 sleeping dog? So, and then the the
00:08:39,440 → 00:08:43,310 circumstantial would be um
Section 22: 00:08:43,320 – 00:09:06,910
00:08:43,320 → 00:08:46,990 sleeping, like the dog whimpered.
00:08:47,000 → 00:08:49,990 Um or when did he whimper? While he was
00:08:50,000 → 00:08:53,550 sleeping. Why? So,
00:08:53,560 → 00:08:56,350 it it's more environmental
00:08:56,360 → 00:08:58,790 and then the attributive is
00:08:58,800 → 00:09:01,430 not. It's more
00:09:01,440 → 00:09:02,510 describing
00:09:02,520 → 00:09:05,150 >> Good. the subject, right?
Section 23: 00:09:06,920 – 00:09:31,750
00:09:06,920 → 00:09:09,541 to add more context. Anyway,
00:09:09,551 → 00:09:09,670 >> [clears throat]
00:09:09,680 → 00:09:11,950 >> Good. Good. Good. Gorgeous. You said
00:09:11,960 → 00:09:13,470 that better than I could. So, I should
00:09:13,480 → 00:09:15,430 just get up and let you say it. Oh.
00:09:15,440 → 00:09:17,190 >> Okay, now, tell me, what do I have to do
00:09:17,200 → 00:09:18,790 with the morphology to make these
00:09:18,800 → 00:09:20,190 participles?
00:09:20,200 → 00:09:23,270 Okay, so first you find the stem.
00:09:25,640 → 00:09:29,550 all of these have different stems.
Section 24: 00:09:31,760 – 00:09:54,910
00:09:31,760 → 00:09:37,070 this first one, which is
00:09:37,080 → 00:09:37,630 You can start.
00:09:37,640 → 00:09:39,310 >> It's nice that it has all of it right
00:09:39,320 → 00:09:41,470 here in the beginning.
00:09:41,480 → 00:09:45,390 Okay. Nice. Um but
00:09:46,720 → 00:09:50,150 So, um paideuo
00:09:50,160 → 00:09:54,910 turns into paideuont.
Section 25: 00:09:54,920 – 00:10:06,670
00:09:58,320 → 00:10:00,990 the present.
Section 26: 00:10:09,350 – 00:10:33,150
00:10:09,350 → 00:10:09,360 then you would kind of um
00:10:11,040 → 00:10:14,390 endings to add on to the stem, right? So
00:10:14,400 → 00:10:17,270 Mhm. the in
00:10:17,280 → 00:10:20,110 in present the
00:10:20,120 → 00:10:22,270 masculine and neuter
00:10:22,280 → 00:10:25,070 um have the stem onts, but the feminine
00:10:25,080 → 00:10:29,110 Mhm. does not kind of is identical to
00:10:29,120 → 00:10:33,150 the third or sorry the um
Section 27: 00:10:33,160 – 00:11:03,910
00:10:34,400 → 00:10:35,870 Yes, you're right. The third declension.
00:10:35,880 → 00:10:38,310 >> yeah, the third declension, yeah. Mhm.
00:10:38,320 → 00:10:38,790 You're right.
00:10:38,800 → 00:10:40,470 >> So um
00:10:40,480 → 00:10:43,070 The feminine looks like this.
00:10:43,080 → 00:10:44,270 >> changes to
00:10:44,640 → 00:10:46,430 >> The feminine looks to me like the
00:10:46,440 → 00:10:48,630 second. Is that right? Is Is it
00:10:48,640 → 00:10:51,470 >> Yeah. I Yeah, I meant to say second and
00:10:51,480 → 00:10:53,910 then the masculine and neuter No, now
00:10:53,920 → 00:10:56,670 you Hey, you let me throw you off. No.
00:10:56,680 → 00:10:58,030 Don't say that. It's
00:10:58,040 → 00:11:00,110 They look like the first.
00:11:00,120 → 00:11:01,630 They look like the first, right? Don't
00:11:01,640 → 00:11:03,470 they look like feminine Yeah, the
00:11:03,480 → 00:11:03,910 feminine
Section 28: 00:11:03,920 – 00:11:12,829
00:11:03,920 → 00:11:06,510 >> declension nouns? The Yes, with the
00:11:06,520 → 00:11:08,150 singular
00:11:08,160 → 00:11:09,550 Yeah. Um
00:11:09,560 → 00:11:12,829 >> Good.
Section 29: 00:11:14,590 – 00:11:24,270
00:11:16,560 → 00:11:20,750 then so the the future active
Section 30: 00:11:27,070 – 00:11:47,750
00:11:27,070 → 00:11:27,080 uh it uses the same endings, but
00:11:27,080 → 00:11:31,270 different stem. So Correct.
00:11:31,280 → 00:11:35,190 pay Oh my gosh, paid a song.
00:11:35,200 → 00:11:38,590 And then the second aorist
00:11:38,600 → 00:11:40,990 pattern is with
00:11:42,640 → 00:11:47,750 Yeah. paid a song sonatas
Section 31: 00:11:47,760 – 00:11:55,270
00:11:47,760 → 00:11:51,030 Where am I? Okay. I'm ahead of myself.
Section 32: 00:11:59,030 – 00:12:23,990
00:11:59,030 → 00:11:59,040 Yeah, and then um the second aorist
00:11:59,040 → 00:12:02,510 is irregular. So you see it's a they use
00:12:02,520 → 00:12:04,590 a different
00:12:04,600 → 00:12:06,670 word a different um
00:12:06,680 → 00:12:11,670 word that ends with a uh
00:12:13,960 → 00:12:17,150 a What is it? Not a epsilon or it is an
00:12:17,160 → 00:12:18,270 epsilon.
Section 33: 00:12:26,310 – 00:12:48,110
00:12:26,310 → 00:12:26,320 You're good. Keep going.
00:12:31,240 → 00:12:35,590 So yeah, second aorist active
00:12:35,600 → 00:12:39,990 it um also you can see how the feminine
00:12:40,000 → 00:12:42,150 looks just like the first declension and
00:12:42,160 → 00:12:45,630 then the masculine neuter are
Section 34: 00:12:48,120 – 00:12:57,710
00:12:48,120 → 00:12:51,910 the same pretty much except for the
00:12:51,920 → 00:12:57,710 the nominative in the plural. But um
Section 35: 00:13:05,630 – 00:13:19,750
00:13:05,630 → 00:13:05,640 perfect active
00:13:05,640 → 00:13:09,990 participle its stem is
00:13:10,000 → 00:13:14,590 from the fourth principal part. So
00:13:14,600 → 00:13:19,750 um pepaid co
Section 36: 00:13:20,390 – 00:13:55,870
00:13:20,400 → 00:13:22,230 >> Yeah. So I'm going to have my fan on in
00:13:22,240 → 00:13:24,110 the background. It's way too loud, but I
00:13:24,120 → 00:13:25,310 need it for a second. I'm sorry.
00:13:25,320 → 00:13:27,990 >> Oh, I don't I don't hear it at all. So
00:13:28,000 → 00:13:30,550 you're good. Um so that's the stem and
00:13:30,560 → 00:13:33,870 it it's the you should note that there's
00:13:33,880 → 00:13:35,870 there's an absence. It says down below
00:13:35,880 → 00:13:39,750 in observations on on two eight now.
00:13:39,760 → 00:13:43,470 Um note the absence of the new
00:13:43,480 → 00:13:46,470 before the tau in the masculine.
00:13:49,760 → 00:13:52,829 otsi would become osi
00:13:54,080 → 00:13:55,870 Um probably.
Section 37: 00:13:55,880 – 00:14:20,550
00:13:58,200 → 00:14:00,750 um the the feminine is declined
00:14:00,760 → 00:14:03,550 regularly.
00:14:03,560 → 00:14:07,950 For the middle and passive participles
00:14:10,360 → 00:14:13,710 they don't have any weird stems and they
00:14:13,720 → 00:14:17,390 decline like regular adjectives. So
Section 38: 00:14:22,670 – 00:14:35,670
00:14:22,670 → 00:14:22,680 So it's similar to present with the
00:14:22,680 → 00:14:24,390 ending by day
00:14:24,400 → 00:14:27,990 and then you add the masculine which is
00:14:29,849 → 00:14:31,590 >> [snorts]
00:14:31,600 → 00:14:35,670 >> and um
Section 39: 00:14:37,710 – 00:15:13,350
00:14:37,710 → 00:14:37,720 the the feminine
00:14:37,720 → 00:14:40,069 omine omine
00:14:41,839 → 00:14:45,190 uh ominon for
00:14:45,200 → 00:14:47,470 the neuter.
00:14:47,480 → 00:14:51,110 And the future adds the same endings,
00:14:52,680 → 00:14:56,030 um adds the sigma to the stem.
00:14:56,040 → 00:14:57,949 And then aorist
00:14:57,959 → 00:15:01,550 middle uses the stem
00:15:01,560 → 00:15:04,310 paideusa.
00:15:04,320 → 00:15:06,990 And then the second aorist just doesn't
00:15:11,120 → 00:15:13,350 The perfects
Section 40: 00:15:13,360 – 00:15:19,150
00:15:14,680 → 00:15:19,150 um the repeated prefix
Section 41: 00:15:19,160 – 00:16:03,630
00:15:19,160 → 00:15:20,949 for the stem.
00:15:20,959 → 00:15:22,790 Okay, I'm going to blow my brains out
00:15:22,800 → 00:15:27,230 now. Okay. Oh. I'm sorry. It's It's too
00:15:28,880 → 00:15:32,065 morphology. Are you joking me? Are you
00:15:32,075 → 00:15:33,069 >> [laughter]
00:15:33,079 → 00:15:35,590 >> You're You're You're overloading me
00:15:35,600 → 00:15:38,310 completely. Oh, I'm sorry.
00:15:38,320 → 00:15:40,870 As I just No, that's okay. It's You're
00:15:40,880 → 00:15:42,069 supposed to.
00:15:43,240 → 00:15:46,550 As I look through all the different
00:15:46,560 → 00:15:48,990 forms, active, middle, and passive for
00:15:49,000 → 00:15:50,949 the participles that you're You're
00:15:50,959 → 00:15:53,310 beautifully going over the morphology
00:15:53,320 → 00:15:55,870 for, right? That's exactly right. That's
00:15:55,880 → 00:15:58,550 how you got to learn them, right?
00:16:00,160 → 00:16:03,630 It strikes It strikes me that Is there
Section 42: 00:16:03,640 – 00:16:37,110
00:16:03,640 → 00:16:05,350 Is there something going on here that
00:16:05,360 → 00:16:08,550 makes this a little easier than it
00:16:08,560 → 00:16:11,430 than it maybe appears? I mean it It
00:16:11,440 → 00:16:12,710 looks like a lot
00:16:12,720 → 00:16:14,510 of forms.
00:16:14,520 → 00:16:16,510 >> Did you notice any Did you notice any
00:16:16,520 → 00:16:18,670 patterns though? Like Did you notice
00:16:18,680 → 00:16:20,550 that like with um when you're talking
00:16:20,560 → 00:16:22,190 about Well, it follows the pattern of a
00:16:22,200 → 00:16:24,310 third declension noun.
00:16:24,320 → 00:16:27,670 Right? Then you can kind of you can kind
00:16:27,680 → 00:16:30,430 of guess what the next form is going to
00:16:30,440 → 00:16:33,150 be because you've got those basic
00:16:33,160 → 00:16:35,390 endings down already.
Section 43: 00:16:37,120 – 00:17:11,030
00:16:37,120 → 00:16:40,430 >> like with the ominos omine ominon
00:16:41,640 → 00:16:44,030 you know those follow first and second
00:16:44,040 → 00:16:47,430 declension nouns. So you really already
00:16:47,440 → 00:16:50,230 have those memorized. Yeah, so now you
00:16:50,240 → 00:16:52,550 just have to focus on identifying those
00:16:52,560 → 00:16:56,030 stems really. Yes, exactly cuz the stems
00:16:56,040 → 00:16:56,910 that matter
00:16:56,920 → 00:16:58,949 You got the big point of the stems. That
00:16:58,959 → 00:17:01,350 I went When you said that a few minutes
00:17:01,360 → 00:17:02,910 ago, I thought okay,
00:17:02,920 → 00:17:05,510 that was a good move. That was a good
00:17:05,520 → 00:17:07,990 move. Uh that was like a good graduate
00:17:08,000 → 00:17:11,030 student move. Right? So good. The fact
Section 44: 00:17:11,040 – 00:17:23,710
00:17:11,040 → 00:17:12,910 that you you recognize It's just about
00:17:12,920 → 00:17:15,069 picking out the stem. Nice job. Okay.
00:17:15,079 → 00:17:16,870 Yeah. Now I'm going to shut up and I'm
00:17:16,880 → 00:17:18,110 going to say
00:17:19,199 → 00:17:21,470 before you finish discussing all the
00:17:21,480 → 00:17:23,710 mor- morphology.
Section 45: 00:17:23,720 – 00:17:42,350
00:17:24,040 → 00:17:25,949 >> Um can you please tell me about the
00:17:25,959 → 00:17:27,750 words that we'll be using this chapter?
00:17:27,760 → 00:17:29,430 I meant to ask you about those right up
00:17:29,440 → 00:17:32,590 front. But can you go over vocab-
00:17:33,080 → 00:17:35,830 >> vocabulary with me, please?
00:17:37,240 → 00:17:42,350 Um so 218
Section 46: 00:17:43,310 – 00:17:49,550
Section 47: 00:17:51,910 – 00:17:55,990
00:17:51,910 → 00:17:51,920 uh egagon
00:17:51,920 → 00:17:55,990 echa egamai echthein
Section 48: 00:17:56,000 – 00:18:00,350
00:17:56,000 → 00:18:00,350 is to lead.
Section 49: 00:18:03,350 – 00:18:09,950
00:18:03,350 → 00:18:03,360 asthene asthenios
00:18:03,360 → 00:18:05,510 Is that a very common Is that a very
00:18:05,520 → 00:18:09,950 common verb, ago?
Section 50: 00:18:12,790 – 00:18:41,590
00:18:12,790 → 00:18:12,800 Uh I think so.
00:18:12,800 → 00:18:15,870 Yes, it is. It's one of the most com-
00:18:15,880 → 00:18:18,790 It's one of the most common verbs.
00:18:18,800 → 00:18:20,870 One of the most common verbs in Greek
00:18:20,880 → 00:18:22,990 and you're going to be adding prefixes
00:18:23,000 → 00:18:25,550 of all kinds to this verb.
00:18:25,840 → 00:18:28,510 >> So I want you to notice how its form
00:18:28,520 → 00:18:31,830 changes. Notice the og becomes an ox.
00:18:31,840 → 00:18:33,830 And that becomes an egg. Then you know,
00:18:33,840 → 00:18:35,470 you you can see that you augment that
00:18:35,480 → 00:18:38,030 alpha to an eta egg. Mhm. And that
00:18:38,040 → 00:18:41,590 becomes aicha in the perfect and egmine
Section 51: 00:18:41,600 – 00:18:51,830
00:18:41,600 → 00:18:44,149 perfect passive. egthein Good. Okay,
00:18:44,159 → 00:18:46,230 sorry. Keep going.
00:18:47,000 → 00:18:51,830 So astheno asthenaios asthenaia
Section 52: 00:18:51,840 – 00:19:02,750
00:18:53,200 → 00:18:55,790 asthenion
00:18:55,800 → 00:18:59,350 as an asinian
Section 53: 00:19:05,070 – 00:19:08,590
00:19:05,080 → 00:19:08,590 at the same time
Section 54: 00:19:14,310 – 00:19:20,070
00:19:14,310 → 00:19:14,320 uh could be an adverb or a preposition
00:19:14,320 → 00:19:20,070 in the dative. Um hat hate hate
Section 55: 00:19:20,080 – 00:19:23,230
Section 56: 00:19:24,950 – 00:20:02,870
00:19:24,950 → 00:19:24,960 is a particle
00:19:24,960 → 00:19:28,230 um noting uh
00:19:28,240 → 00:19:30,630 assertion
00:19:30,640 → 00:19:34,390 um it's a it's a causal participle.
00:19:34,400 → 00:19:37,470 Good. Which is a form of um
00:19:38,800 → 00:19:41,710 a circumstantial participle, right?
00:19:41,720 → 00:19:43,390 Good. Good. Which we'll talk about.
00:19:43,400 → 00:19:44,830 Which you'll show me how to use in a
00:19:44,840 → 00:19:48,790 second. Yep. Yes. Um and then
00:19:48,800 → 00:19:49,950 there is a
00:19:49,960 → 00:19:52,750 a few more particles and
00:19:52,760 → 00:19:56,688 adverbs, so Um a a epita is
00:19:56,698 → 00:19:57,790 [clears throat and snorts] an adverb
00:19:57,800 → 00:19:59,590 means then,
00:19:59,600 → 00:20:02,870 thereupon.
Section 57: 00:20:06,430 – 00:20:11,590
00:20:06,430 → 00:20:06,440 eko ekso ekso
00:20:06,440 → 00:20:11,590 have come or be present.
Section 58: 00:20:15,070 – 00:20:22,270
00:20:15,070 → 00:20:15,080 kaiper although
00:20:16,880 → 00:20:22,270 mete mete are conjunctions, neither nor.
Section 59: 00:20:22,280 – 00:20:32,310
00:20:26,680 → 00:20:29,630 is another causal participle.
Section 60: 00:20:39,230 – 00:20:49,270
00:20:40,880 → 00:20:49,270 nevertheless
Section 61: 00:20:50,790 – 00:21:30,870
00:20:50,800 → 00:20:53,990 oute is neither nor as well.
00:20:54,000 → 00:20:55,350 Um conjunctions.
00:20:55,360 → 00:20:57,430 >> the way, by the way, what do we get from
00:20:57,440 → 00:21:00,150 oinos, which is wine in English? Do you
00:21:00,160 → 00:21:02,150 know of any words in English?
00:21:02,160 → 00:21:03,070 What's the study of it?
00:21:03,080 → 00:21:05,470 >> Uh we
00:21:05,480 → 00:21:07,710 The study of wine?
00:21:08,800 → 00:21:11,510 Um I don't know.
00:21:11,520 → 00:21:13,150 Oinology
00:21:13,160 → 00:21:15,510 oinology, you just put an
00:21:15,520 → 00:21:18,150 ology on the end of it. Oinology and
00:21:18,160 → 00:21:22,590 it's study of wine. Love it. Oinos is so
00:21:22,600 → 00:21:24,310 so common. It's all over the place.
00:21:24,320 → 00:21:27,070 Anyway, sorry. Pas pas upon is all and
00:21:27,080 → 00:21:30,870 every. Mhm. Um stratos is an army,
Section 62: 00:21:30,880 – 00:22:13,070
00:21:30,880 → 00:21:33,110 right? Nothing big there. Hos not
00:21:33,120 → 00:21:34,470 conjunction. Look what they say with
00:21:34,480 → 00:21:38,869 participle. Of cause or purpose.
00:21:38,879 → 00:21:39,630 >> [laughter]
00:21:39,640 → 00:21:42,750 >> Not asserted by speaker of the sentence.
00:21:42,760 → 00:21:45,590 Wait a minute. What? Oh god.
00:21:45,600 → 00:21:48,070 It's going to get so Notice they gave
00:21:48,080 → 00:21:50,910 you the vocabulary notes for ago.
00:21:50,920 → 00:21:52,150 Right? You
00:21:52,160 → 00:21:55,350 Why? Cuz it's a hugely hugely common
00:21:56,600 → 00:21:57,470 So, yeah.
00:21:57,480 → 00:21:58,910 >> Yeah.
00:21:58,920 → 00:22:01,430 Yeah, okay. Okay, now explain to me how
00:22:01,440 → 00:22:03,710 to use these participles. And I'm
00:22:03,720 → 00:22:04,990 serious.
00:22:05,840 → 00:22:07,910 like make it simple so I understand how
00:22:07,920 → 00:22:09,590 to do this.
00:22:09,600 → 00:22:13,070 Already. So,
Section 63: 00:22:13,080 – 00:22:43,790
00:22:13,080 → 00:22:16,150 the So, the attributive participle is
00:22:16,160 → 00:22:21,470 found often between a um an article and
00:22:21,480 → 00:22:25,030 a noun. For example, the sacrificing
00:22:25,040 → 00:22:27,990 poet, wherever wherever he is.
00:22:28,000 → 00:22:31,110 Oh, yes. Um 213.
00:22:31,120 → 00:22:33,710 They use the example of sacrificing
00:22:33,720 → 00:22:36,590 poet. The poet was sacrificing.
00:22:37,830 → 00:22:38,070 >> [clears throat]
00:22:38,080 → 00:22:42,070 >> The poet who was sacrificing was saved.
Section 64: 00:22:43,800 – 00:22:47,710
Section 65: 00:22:57,710 – 00:23:28,830
00:22:57,710 → 00:22:57,720 horeusa the dancer
00:22:57,720 → 00:23:02,230 Um and versus it being the woman who
00:23:03,760 → 00:23:06,990 Um so, the attributive
00:23:07,000 → 00:23:09,790 participle describes
00:23:09,800 → 00:23:13,310 the noun, but it's all folded up. When
00:23:13,320 → 00:23:14,990 in English, you can unfold it to
00:23:15,000 → 00:23:17,030 understand its the full extent of its
00:23:17,040 → 00:23:20,870 meaning, but in the Greek it it's all
00:23:20,880 → 00:23:23,470 folded up and um
00:23:23,480 → 00:23:26,630 it can be specific or generic.
Section 66: 00:23:28,840 – 00:24:04,230
00:23:31,560 → 00:23:32,550 >> Yeah.
00:23:32,560 → 00:23:34,950 Don't you love that? Isn't Isn't that
00:23:34,960 → 00:23:36,510 gorgeous?
00:23:36,520 → 00:23:39,270 Um horeusa
00:23:39,280 → 00:23:42,390 The one she who is dancing is like
00:23:42,400 → 00:23:44,590 literally who it is, but you've just
00:23:44,600 → 00:23:47,550 taken a verb. I mean, that's a verb.
00:23:47,560 → 00:23:50,070 Horeo is just a dance. That's a verb,
00:23:50,480 → 00:23:53,350 >> Yeah. Right? So, and then you're taking
00:23:53,360 → 00:23:54,830 it and putting an ending on it that
00:23:54,840 → 00:23:56,350 looks feminine.
00:23:56,360 → 00:23:58,270 Right? Matches the article and all of a
00:23:58,280 → 00:24:00,350 sudden all of a sudden you've got That's
00:24:00,360 → 00:24:02,430 really a noun. The dan-
00:24:02,440 → 00:24:04,230 The dancer is a noun.
Section 67: 00:24:04,240 – 00:24:17,790
00:24:04,240 → 00:24:06,590 But somehow you've transformed an action
00:24:06,600 → 00:24:08,350 into a person.
00:24:10,080 → 00:24:13,070 They love doing participial tricks like
00:24:13,080 → 00:24:14,470 this. Okay, sorry. Shut I'll shut up.
00:24:14,480 → 00:24:17,790 Keep going.
Section 68: 00:24:23,150 – 00:24:30,830
00:24:23,150 → 00:24:23,160 The um So, the circumstantial participle
00:24:23,160 → 00:24:27,230 is one that's not attributive.
00:24:27,240 → 00:24:30,830 But basically,
Section 69: 00:24:32,790 – 00:24:36,230
00:24:32,790 → 00:24:32,800 it describes
Section 70: 00:24:38,430 – 00:25:09,910
00:24:38,430 → 00:24:38,440 the circumstances of what's happening
00:24:38,440 → 00:24:43,470 around the noun and then it answers why
00:24:45,480 → 00:24:47,790 when and how.
00:24:47,800 → 00:24:51,590 So, attributive would describe the noun.
00:24:52,440 → 00:24:55,030 It would limit or identify.
00:24:55,040 → 00:24:57,190 And it usually has the article. A
00:24:57,200 → 00:24:59,630 circumstantial shows the environment. It
00:24:59,640 → 00:25:01,190 modifies
00:25:01,200 → 00:25:03,230 the verb.
00:25:03,240 → 00:25:05,510 And it usually
00:25:06,240 → 00:25:09,910 does not have an article.
Section 71: 00:25:09,920 – 00:25:21,990
00:25:09,920 → 00:25:13,150 And then on 215,
00:25:13,160 → 00:25:16,950 um it describes
00:25:18,360 → 00:25:21,990 different adverbs.
Section 72: 00:25:30,590 – 00:25:52,070
00:25:30,590 → 00:25:30,600 So, the On number one, it's the temporal
00:25:30,600 → 00:25:33,710 adverb. So, they use
00:25:33,720 → 00:25:37,790 epita, which is then or thereupon. So,
00:25:37,800 → 00:25:41,750 the temporal adverb shows something
00:25:45,000 → 00:25:47,470 or when something is happening. So, it
00:25:47,480 → 00:25:49,310 has to do with time.
Section 73: 00:25:54,430 – 00:26:10,550
00:25:54,430 → 00:25:54,440 and adds time.
00:25:54,800 → 00:25:56,910 >> Do the Read Read me the examples in
00:25:56,920 → 00:25:58,470 Greek there. I want to do the temporal
00:25:58,480 → 00:26:00,990 adverb in Greek. So, read me the
00:26:01,000 → 00:26:02,990 examples and explain to me what's going
00:26:03,920 → 00:26:10,550 alysantes epita tois theois esusamen
Section 74: 00:26:10,560 – 00:26:50,590
00:26:10,560 → 00:26:14,190 Freed we then sacrificed to the gods. Or
00:26:14,200 → 00:26:16,590 upon being freed, we then sacrificed to
00:26:16,600 → 00:26:18,990 the gods. After being freed, we
00:26:19,000 → 00:26:22,750 sacrificed and after we were freed,
00:26:22,760 → 00:26:25,350 we then sacrificed to the gods.
00:26:25,800 → 00:26:27,950 >> So, that So, that participle can mean
00:26:27,960 → 00:26:31,390 all of those things, right? Yeah.
00:26:31,720 → 00:26:34,910 >> Okay. It's most literal form. Yes. No,
00:26:34,920 → 00:26:37,790 that is It's most literal form.
00:26:37,800 → 00:26:40,870 Luthentes is just freed.
00:26:40,880 → 00:26:43,190 Something is freed, right? And they're
00:26:43,200 → 00:26:44,950 trying to tell you, well, with that
00:26:44,960 → 00:26:46,710 epita then,
00:26:46,720 → 00:26:49,270 we're trying to explain the time, you
00:26:49,280 → 00:26:50,590 know, what's going on with the time.
Section 75: 00:26:50,600 – 00:27:29,790
00:26:50,600 → 00:26:54,230 Upon being freed, after being freed,
00:26:54,240 → 00:26:57,910 right? Yeah. Okay. Thereupon, yeah. It's
00:26:58,920 → 00:27:01,390 a dimmer switch a dimmer switch to how
00:27:01,400 → 00:27:05,350 specific and and not, you know, and
00:27:05,360 → 00:27:07,150 condensed it is.
00:27:07,160 → 00:27:09,590 Yes, gorgeous. I like that. Exactly,
00:27:09,600 → 00:27:11,470 right? And they're They're going to be
00:27:11,480 → 00:27:12,830 doing this. They're going to be showing
00:27:12,840 → 00:27:15,870 It's like varying levels of complexity.
00:27:15,880 → 00:27:17,790 And here they want you to know there's a
00:27:17,800 → 00:27:21,110 temporal thing going on. And this this
00:27:21,120 → 00:27:23,710 participle is giving you kind of the
00:27:23,720 → 00:27:25,270 circumstances
00:27:26,320 → 00:27:27,750 you know, what
00:27:27,760 → 00:27:29,790 where the main verb is, right? Where
Section 76: 00:27:29,800 – 00:27:43,950
00:27:29,800 → 00:27:31,830 does it say circumstantial? Oh, there it
00:27:31,840 → 00:27:33,230 is. Circumstantial. Yeah, these are
00:27:33,240 → 00:27:35,270 circumstantial participles. Gorgeous.
00:27:35,280 → 00:27:36,830 Okay, keep going. I want another example
00:27:36,840 → 00:27:38,950 with with homos.
00:27:38,960 → 00:27:43,950 Okay. Um So, homos
Section 77: 00:27:48,270 – 00:28:18,110
00:27:48,270 → 00:27:48,280 um means nevertheless or is used in that
00:27:52,880 → 00:27:55,830 with the verb it is concessive,
00:27:55,840 → 00:27:57,790 which means
00:27:57,800 → 00:28:00,550 uh when something happens it it's when
00:28:00,560 → 00:28:03,550 something happens in spite of something.
00:28:06,520 → 00:28:09,390 the type of
00:28:11,040 → 00:28:14,669 the type of participle that describes an
00:28:14,679 → 00:28:18,110 environment that then causes
Section 78: 00:28:18,120 – 00:28:56,630
00:28:18,120 → 00:28:21,669 or creates tension. So,
00:28:21,679 → 00:28:24,470 below it says it uses the example of the
00:28:24,480 → 00:28:28,230 same similarly as as the temporal, but
00:28:28,240 → 00:28:31,750 um it says freed we nevertheless did not
00:28:31,760 → 00:28:34,550 sacrifice to the gods. Upon being freed,
00:28:34,560 → 00:28:36,510 we nevertheless didn't sacrifice to the
00:28:36,520 → 00:28:39,350 gods. Although freed, we nevertheless
00:28:39,360 → 00:28:41,470 did not sacrifice to the gods.
00:28:41,480 → 00:28:42,950 And although we were freed, we
00:28:42,960 → 00:28:45,630 nevertheless did not sacrifice to the
00:28:45,640 → 00:28:49,430 gods. So, you can see how it
00:28:52,440 → 00:28:56,630 doing something and then we nevertheless
Section 79: 00:28:56,640 – 00:29:02,430
00:28:56,640 → 00:28:58,790 something, you know, happened. We did
00:28:58,800 → 00:29:02,430 something else. So,
Section 80: 00:29:04,470 – 00:29:22,630
00:29:04,470 → 00:29:04,480 that's homos.
00:29:06,720 → 00:29:09,669 Almost like I mean, don't fail to see
00:29:10,960 → 00:29:15,070 kind of intricate nature of the
00:29:15,080 → 00:29:17,630 the fact that the of what the Greek is
00:29:17,640 → 00:29:19,909 doing. The fact that you have like four
00:29:19,919 → 00:29:22,630 different English expressions
Section 81: 00:29:22,640 – 00:29:57,070
00:29:22,640 → 00:29:25,470 sitting underneath one Greek expression.
00:29:25,480 → 00:29:28,350 If you didn't know either Greek or
00:29:28,360 → 00:29:29,909 English and you look at this, you'd
00:29:29,919 → 00:29:33,070 think, "Wow, that big blocky English
00:29:33,080 → 00:29:36,350 language is not very efficient. It can't
00:29:36,360 → 00:29:39,270 It takes them four sentences, right?
00:29:39,280 → 00:29:41,390 Whereas the Greek has captured all that
00:29:41,400 → 00:29:45,510 data in one line." S- You know, it's
00:29:45,520 → 00:29:47,470 kind of like it looks inefficient.
00:29:47,480 → 00:29:48,670 Whatever that second one is, it's
00:29:48,680 → 00:29:51,150 wasting a lot of a lot of time and
00:29:51,160 → 00:29:53,070 effort. That little
00:29:53,080 → 00:29:57,070 adverb almost is doing something that's
Section 82: 00:29:57,080 – 00:30:20,590
00:29:57,080 → 00:29:59,750 setting up a concession.
00:29:59,760 → 00:30:01,790 It's like the Greek wants to know, okay,
00:30:01,800 → 00:30:03,230 if you really want to know if there's
00:30:03,240 → 00:30:05,510 some kind of concession going on here,
00:30:05,520 → 00:30:07,870 we can use it this way. You know, so
00:30:07,880 → 00:30:10,150 anyway, I love it. Anyway, how about kai
00:30:10,160 → 00:30:11,430 per? What was that What does that one
00:30:12,640 → 00:30:14,510 Kai per, um
00:30:14,520 → 00:30:17,350 it's although and
00:30:17,360 → 00:30:20,590 um it means it's
Section 83: 00:30:20,600 – 00:30:43,510
00:30:20,600 → 00:30:23,110 it well, kai per
00:30:23,120 → 00:30:26,670 plus a participle means um that it's
00:30:26,680 → 00:30:29,350 concessive. So,
00:30:30,880 → 00:30:33,070 kai per although indicates parts Yeah,
00:30:33,080 → 00:30:35,670 okay. Uh
00:30:35,680 → 00:30:39,070 So, it shows the thing was true, but
00:30:39,080 → 00:30:41,630 then something else happened. So, it's
00:30:41,640 → 00:30:43,510 background
Section 84: 00:30:43,520 – 00:31:05,710
00:30:43,520 → 00:30:45,710 um for something that happens and
00:30:45,720 → 00:30:46,990 doesn't prevent something else from
00:30:47,000 → 00:30:48,630 happening. So,
00:30:49,760 → 00:30:52,910 freed and I'm as a speaker I'm asserting
00:30:52,920 → 00:30:54,670 that this is the cause, then they
00:30:54,680 → 00:30:57,750 sacrificed to the gods or
00:30:57,760 → 00:31:05,710 it's almost like um
Section 85: 00:31:08,510 – 00:31:33,510
00:31:08,510 → 00:31:08,520 they are proving something in a way, you
00:31:08,520 → 00:31:10,150 know, they're causing
00:31:10,160 → 00:31:12,110 it Yeah.
00:31:12,120 → 00:31:15,030 I've never found anybody
00:31:15,040 → 00:31:18,670 who can translate who can use and I as a
00:31:18,680 → 00:31:20,590 speaker I'm asserting that this is the
00:31:20,600 → 00:31:22,870 cause. I've never seen somebody
00:31:22,880 → 00:31:26,710 translate it, but that is what hate and
00:31:26,720 → 00:31:29,830 hoya are doing with that participle.
00:31:29,840 → 00:31:33,510 So, how do you express
Section 86: 00:31:33,520 – 00:31:56,150
00:31:33,520 → 00:31:35,230 that you
00:31:35,240 → 00:31:37,630 that you the speaker
00:31:37,640 → 00:31:40,950 are you know, standing behind this is
00:31:40,960 → 00:31:43,710 fact. You use a hate or a hoya to do
00:31:43,720 → 00:31:45,710 that. Be
00:31:45,720 → 00:31:47,630 Yeah. Because they were freed. Now, how
00:31:47,640 → 00:31:48,830 do you get How do you get How do you get
00:31:48,840 → 00:31:50,270 that into the translation is what I'm
00:31:50,280 → 00:31:52,390 asking. Because they were freed, they
00:31:52,400 → 00:31:56,150 sacrificed to the gods.
Section 87: 00:31:56,160 – 00:32:35,590
00:31:56,160 → 00:31:57,710 Like how do you fit that in there
00:31:57,720 → 00:31:59,390 without saying something stupid and
00:31:59,400 → 00:32:01,470 blocky like and I as a speaker I'm
00:32:01,480 → 00:32:03,590 asserting this is the cause. Because
00:32:03,600 → 00:32:05,550 none of that is there, right? None of
00:32:05,560 → 00:32:07,790 None of that is actually there. Yeah.
00:32:07,800 → 00:32:10,950 >> So, yeah. I mean
00:32:10,960 → 00:32:14,230 it just gives the reason for the action.
00:32:15,800 → 00:32:18,510 of the verb. So, it's like saying for
00:32:21,760 → 00:32:23,390 for what?
00:32:23,400 → 00:32:26,470 Be because for why?
00:32:26,480 → 00:32:28,390 Yeah. Yeah.
00:32:28,400 → 00:32:30,910 Because they were freed,
00:32:30,920 → 00:32:33,550 because they were freed,
00:32:33,560 → 00:32:35,590 right? That's what we all think. I see,
Section 88: 00:32:35,600 – 00:33:08,669
00:32:35,600 → 00:32:37,950 I don't know. You still You can't really
00:32:37,960 → 00:32:40,870 do anything to sneak that in there. So,
00:32:40,880 → 00:32:43,430 as a trans As a translator though, you
00:32:43,440 → 00:32:45,430 have to make take a note of that, you
00:32:45,440 → 00:32:47,270 know, make note of that.
00:32:47,280 → 00:32:49,070 And you would you don't want to leave
00:32:49,080 → 00:32:51,230 off If it's really important that Say
00:32:51,240 → 00:32:53,710 the speaker here is Aristotle.
00:32:53,720 → 00:32:55,710 And Aristotle is saying, "Yeah, I think
00:32:55,720 → 00:32:57,350 this, but some other bonehead thinks
00:32:58,560 → 00:33:00,030 Right? And
00:33:00,040 → 00:33:03,390 And then he uses a hate or a hoya,
00:33:03,400 → 00:33:06,669 right? And he says, you know,
00:33:06,679 → 00:33:08,669 you've got to recognize that's on his
Section 89: 00:33:08,679 – 00:33:32,470
00:33:08,679 → 00:33:10,630 authority.
00:33:11,000 → 00:33:14,750 >> So, it It's not really translatable.
00:33:14,760 → 00:33:16,470 Right? A lot of things in Greek aren't
00:33:16,480 → 00:33:18,750 really translatable.
00:33:18,760 → 00:33:21,350 Yeah. Shui, can you close that?
00:33:21,360 → 00:33:23,830 So, but you're going to be hearing them
00:33:23,840 → 00:33:25,990 when you translate. When you hear the
00:33:26,000 → 00:33:27,470 hate or the hoya, you're going to be
00:33:27,480 → 00:33:30,030 thinking, "Yeah, Aristotle. This is his
00:33:30,040 → 00:33:32,470 assertion, right?"
Section 90: 00:33:32,480 – 00:33:51,910
00:33:32,480 → 00:33:35,150 Okay. Do you see how much detail there
00:33:35,160 → 00:33:37,150 is in this? It's a Yeah.
00:33:37,160 → 00:33:39,790 >> It's just, you know, it's just amazing.
00:33:39,800 → 00:33:42,310 How about hos? Hos is next.
00:33:47,280 → 00:33:51,910 hos, let's see.
Section 91: 00:33:54,750 – 00:34:24,389
00:33:54,750 → 00:33:54,760 Expresses cause or purpose.
00:33:55,720 → 00:33:59,030 This is the cause or purpose is one
00:33:59,040 → 00:34:00,950 given by the subject of the sentence,
00:34:00,960 → 00:34:02,230 not [clears throat] one asserted on the
00:34:02,240 → 00:34:05,230 authority of the speaker or writer.
00:34:05,240 → 00:34:07,630 So, and this reason may be either real
00:34:07,640 → 00:34:08,790 or pretended. [clears throat]
00:34:08,800 → 00:34:12,030 I wrote that if you combine
00:34:12,040 → 00:34:14,590 um hos and the participle, then the
00:34:14,600 → 00:34:18,669 meaning shifts from because
00:34:18,679 → 00:34:24,389 um to or as if
Section 92: 00:34:27,848 – 00:34:41,669
00:34:27,848 → 00:34:27,858 Oh, because um to as if, sorry. I was
00:34:27,858 → 00:34:28,230 >> [snorts]
00:34:28,240 → 00:34:31,149 >> not understanding my reading. Um
00:34:31,159 → 00:34:33,630 or it's just claiming something. It's
00:34:33,640 → 00:34:36,430 the It's subjective and not fact, so
00:34:36,440 → 00:34:38,909 it's the
Section 93: 00:34:43,830 – 00:35:03,390
00:34:43,830 → 00:34:43,840 it could be real or pretended. So, what
00:34:43,840 → 00:34:46,830 the subject believes or interprets or
00:34:46,840 → 00:34:51,550 perceives um as a reason um according to
00:34:51,560 → 00:34:53,470 the speaker.
00:34:53,480 → 00:34:54,270 What the subject
00:34:54,280 → 00:34:57,230 >> Yeah. Yeah, explain that to me.
00:34:57,240 → 00:35:00,510 Okay, explain it to me using the example
00:35:00,520 → 00:35:03,390 now. Okay. So,
Section 94: 00:35:03,400 – 00:35:24,990
00:35:03,400 → 00:35:05,750 >> of the sentence there ethoson is the
00:35:07,320 → 00:35:11,470 >> Right? So, we're not necessarily
00:35:11,480 → 00:35:14,310 getting our
00:35:14,320 → 00:35:15,750 impression.
00:35:15,760 → 00:35:17,630 We're the speaker or the writer. We're
00:35:17,640 → 00:35:19,710 getting the impression of the subject
Section 95: 00:35:27,430 – 00:35:40,310
00:35:27,430 → 00:35:27,440 So, Why is that important? I'm just
00:35:27,440 → 00:35:29,110 going to ask you Why the [\h__\h] is that
00:35:29,120 → 00:35:31,470 important? Who cares? Who cares what the
00:35:31,480 → 00:35:33,750 speaker or writer thinks?
00:35:34,359 → 00:35:37,030 >> about is that it says they sacrificed to
00:35:37,040 → 00:35:40,310 the gods freed.
Section 96: 00:35:40,320 – 00:36:10,029
00:35:40,320 → 00:35:42,990 Yeah. Hos freed, right? Because they
00:35:43,000 → 00:35:44,750 were freed, they sacrificed to the gods.
00:35:44,760 → 00:35:47,830 Isn't that [\h__\h] enough? No, it's not.
00:35:47,840 → 00:35:51,110 Because I am not seeing I am not seeing
00:35:51,120 → 00:35:53,390 Yeah, I am not seeing that the speaker
00:35:53,400 → 00:35:56,710 is not making this assertion.
00:35:56,720 → 00:35:59,270 It's so It's very like uh
00:35:59,280 → 00:36:01,515 a sarcastic sounding, you know?
00:36:01,525 → 00:36:04,190 >> [laughter and snorts]
00:36:05,550 → 00:36:05,560 >> Right.
00:36:06,840 → 00:36:10,029 Good. Good.
Section 97: 00:36:10,039 – 00:36:12,110
00:36:10,039 → 00:36:12,110 >> [sighs]
Section 98: 00:36:14,190 – 00:36:28,870
00:36:14,190 → 00:36:14,200 >> They Look at the second example. They
00:36:14,200 → 00:36:17,310 were sent to sacrifice to the gods and
00:36:17,320 → 00:36:19,310 then they have in parentheses as they
00:36:20,720 → 00:36:24,710 Epemps the son. Right? Epemps the son.
00:36:24,720 → 00:36:28,870 They were sent hos thusontes
Section 99: 00:36:28,880 – 00:37:07,710
00:36:28,880 → 00:36:31,470 to sacrifice. They're turning it into a
00:36:31,480 → 00:36:33,710 purpose clause.
00:36:33,720 → 00:36:37,150 Right? Turning it into a purpose clause.
00:36:37,160 → 00:36:39,150 Well, you Here's something that was told
00:36:39,160 → 00:36:41,349 to me that I'll tell you now. When you
00:36:41,359 → 00:36:43,430 When it comes to hos,
00:36:43,440 → 00:36:45,630 Mhm. you should You should try it.
00:36:45,640 → 00:36:48,390 Always try it as a purpose.
00:36:48,640 → 00:36:52,430 >> If a purpose doesn't work, try thus, t h
00:36:53,440 → 00:36:54,670 >> Yeah.
00:36:55,280 → 00:36:56,030 >> Okay.
00:36:56,040 → 00:36:59,870 Right? Thus sacrificing to the gods,
00:36:59,880 → 00:37:01,910 they were sent.
00:37:01,920 → 00:37:05,310 They were sent to the gods to sacrifice.
00:37:05,320 → 00:37:07,710 Right? You try Oh, the purpose fits.
Section 100: 00:37:07,720 – 00:37:36,630
00:37:07,720 → 00:37:10,470 Right? Hos can be a whole bunch of
00:37:10,480 → 00:37:12,390 things. You're going to get really
00:37:12,400 → 00:37:14,070 You're going to get really
00:37:14,080 → 00:37:16,750 uh Watch Watch this. Um Well, I can't do
00:37:16,760 → 00:37:19,990 it now, but sometimes Sometime on TLG I
00:37:20,000 → 00:37:23,910 mean on the TLG God, sometime on LSJ, I
00:37:23,920 → 00:37:25,830 want you to look up hos. And when you
00:37:25,840 → 00:37:29,110 see that it's like 18 pages long,
00:37:29,120 → 00:37:30,910 okay? You're going to be like You're
00:37:30,920 → 00:37:33,550 going to be like, "Oh, okay. I kind of I
00:37:33,560 → 00:37:35,150 know that there's a whole neighborhood
00:37:35,160 → 00:37:36,630 of [\h__\h] that can happen when you get
Section 101: 00:37:36,640 – 00:38:11,710
00:37:36,640 → 00:37:38,310 hos, right?" Yeah.
00:37:38,320 → 00:37:40,150 >> So, now they're teaching you cause or
00:37:40,160 → 00:37:42,710 purpose. Right? Since they were freed
00:37:42,720 → 00:37:44,230 because they were freed, they
00:37:44,240 → 00:37:47,750 sacrificed, right? As opposed to
00:37:47,760 → 00:37:51,030 they were sent to sacrifice. Good. Okay.
00:37:51,480 → 00:37:53,590 >> All right, let's take a break. They're
00:37:53,600 → 00:37:55,230 going to give us the negatives and then
00:37:55,240 → 00:37:57,750 I want to start the adjectives.
00:37:57,760 → 00:38:01,550 Um pas pas upon and that'll be it for
00:38:01,560 → 00:38:04,510 your explanation. And I know it's late,
00:38:04,520 → 00:38:06,070 but do you still have time to do some
00:38:06,080 → 00:38:07,950 exercises or no?
00:38:07,960 → 00:38:09,630 Uh sure.
00:38:09,640 → 00:38:11,710 Okay, good. I don't want to like I don't
Section 102: 00:38:11,720 – 00:38:44,611
00:38:11,720 → 00:38:13,990 know your kids are probably asleep and
00:38:14,000 → 00:38:15,990 Yeah, they're they're They're good.
00:38:16,000 → 00:38:17,550 They're good. Everything's good. Do you
00:38:17,560 → 00:38:18,990 need to give it
00:38:19,000 → 00:38:20,790 Okay, fine. If you need to get up and
00:38:20,800 → 00:38:23,110 run and put somebody back to bed or
00:38:23,120 → 00:38:25,870 something, please feel free. Um I know
00:38:25,880 → 00:38:27,510 it's later there. Okay, how long of
00:38:27,520 → 00:38:29,190 break do you want before we do
00:38:29,200 → 00:38:32,190 adjectives and exercise? Um I mean, we
00:38:32,200 → 00:38:34,070 could do like 10 minutes.
00:38:34,080 → 00:38:36,430 10 minutes. Let's do 10 minutes. Nine
00:38:36,440 → 00:38:39,349 Let's see, 55. 55, I'll be here.
00:38:39,359 → 00:38:44,611 Okay, cool.
Section 103: 00:38:49,150 – 00:39:03,910
00:38:49,160 → 00:38:51,790 You read You read it better than I do.
00:38:51,800 → 00:38:53,750 You should have You should do the vocal
00:38:53,760 → 00:38:55,550 recording for the
00:38:55,560 → 00:38:57,390 for the book if they have an audio
00:38:57,400 → 00:39:00,390 version. That was fantastic. You have
00:39:00,400 → 00:39:01,710 That was Paet. You have a gorgeous
00:39:01,720 → 00:39:03,910 voice, Paet.
Section 104: 00:39:03,920 – 00:39:40,230
00:39:03,920 → 00:39:06,430 Thanks, Doc.
00:39:08,040 → 00:39:10,950 Madalena, you want to continue?
00:39:10,960 → 00:39:12,990 Uh sure.
00:39:13,000 → 00:39:14,390 Okay. How
00:39:14,400 → 00:39:17,670 How How are you understanding
00:39:17,680 → 00:39:19,750 all the material? Is it You seem like
00:39:19,760 → 00:39:22,630 you're acing it. Like, you know,
00:39:23,080 → 00:39:24,470 >> Well, we'll see when we get to the
00:39:24,480 → 00:39:26,390 exercises. I mean, I don't have any of
00:39:26,400 → 00:39:28,497 them memorized or anything yet, so.
00:39:28,507 → 00:39:29,390 >> [laughter]
00:39:29,400 → 00:39:29,990 >> Okay.
00:39:30,000 → 00:39:32,390 >> Um but I I understand the concepts and I
00:39:32,400 → 00:39:35,270 understand like the endings and stuff. I
00:39:35,280 → 00:39:37,310 just It's just a lot of stuff to
00:39:37,320 → 00:39:39,870 remember all at once, so.
Section 105: 00:39:40,240 – 00:40:05,590
00:39:40,240 → 00:39:42,270 >> Keep your Keep your finger back on the
00:39:42,280 → 00:39:45,230 page with the circumstantial participles
00:39:45,240 → 00:39:48,030 in case we get any of those Mhm. words
00:39:48,040 → 00:39:49,830 that are used with them, we can go flip
00:39:49,840 → 00:39:51,430 back and say, "Well, what was it Which
00:39:51,440 → 00:39:53,790 one was that?" Okay, sorry. Go ahead.
00:39:53,800 → 00:39:55,990 Oh, yes. All those.
00:39:57,480 → 00:40:02,750 But we were at may. It's a negative. So
00:40:02,760 → 00:40:05,590 let's see.
Section 106: 00:40:05,600 – 00:40:12,550
00:40:05,600 → 00:40:07,470 So the negative
00:40:07,480 → 00:40:09,550 it says use may.
Section 107: 00:40:19,470 – 00:40:24,150
00:40:19,470 → 00:40:19,480 circumstantial participles uses protases
00:40:19,480 → 00:40:24,150 of conditional sentences use
Section 108: 00:40:27,910 – 00:40:40,710
00:40:27,910 → 00:40:27,920 may. And And all
00:40:27,920 → 00:40:29,950 circumstantial Wait. All circumstantial
00:40:29,960 → 00:40:31,470 participles is
00:40:31,480 → 00:40:33,910 ou except for conditional participles
00:40:33,920 → 00:40:36,670 which uses may. Okay.
00:40:36,680 → 00:40:40,710 I think I read that backwards. But
Section 109: 00:40:46,510 – 00:41:17,310
00:40:46,510 → 00:40:46,520 with the circumstantial Yeah, use ou and
00:40:46,520 → 00:40:48,230 conditional use may.
00:40:48,240 → 00:40:49,870 If you don't have a negative or an
00:40:49,880 → 00:40:52,270 adverb or
00:40:54,560 → 00:40:57,830 a conjunction, then only way to tell
00:40:57,840 → 00:41:00,190 between circumstantial participles is
00:41:00,200 → 00:41:01,830 context.
00:41:03,240 → 00:41:06,030 I think it says that
00:41:06,040 → 00:41:07,990 down here. So
00:41:08,000 → 00:41:10,750 Can we do one of those negative examples
00:41:10,760 → 00:41:13,430 with uh that they give in Greek?
Section 110: 00:41:17,320 – 00:41:24,390
Section 111: 00:41:26,910 – 00:41:37,910
00:41:26,910 → 00:41:26,920 It shows the difference between the
00:41:26,920 → 00:41:29,190 conditional and then the circumstantial.
00:41:30,280 → 00:41:33,230 in the negative, the conditional would
00:41:33,240 → 00:41:37,910 be ou blaptomenoi.
Section 112: 00:41:39,790 – 00:42:03,070
00:41:39,790 → 00:41:39,800 Esthelomen
00:41:41,200 → 00:41:44,630 pempomen. So not being harmed, we are
00:41:44,640 → 00:41:46,950 willing to send gifts. Since we are not
00:41:46,960 → 00:41:48,950 harmed, we are willing to send gifts.
00:41:48,960 → 00:41:51,070 Whereas the circumstantial
00:41:51,953 → 00:41:52,230 >> [clears throat]
00:41:52,240 → 00:41:54,510 >> it is
00:41:54,520 → 00:41:56,870 it's formulated differently.
00:41:56,880 → 00:41:58,670 So it starts with
00:41:58,680 → 00:42:03,070 blaptomen blaptomenoi.
Section 113: 00:42:05,790 – 00:42:30,790
00:42:05,790 → 00:42:05,800 And then ouk.
00:42:05,800 → 00:42:09,390 So we do not wish to send gifts. So the
00:42:10,920 → 00:42:14,510 is on not wishing to send gifts instead
00:42:14,520 → 00:42:19,590 of not being harmed in the conditional.
00:42:24,040 → 00:42:26,590 It's a lot to remember, isn't it?
00:42:26,600 → 00:42:30,790 Yeah. Lots of little rules.
Section 114: 00:42:30,800 – 00:42:48,390
00:42:30,800 → 00:42:34,270 Yeah. Just remember, you know what
00:42:34,280 → 00:42:36,350 Remember that ouk and that may are going
00:42:36,360 → 00:42:39,030 to switch and conditionals, of course,
00:42:39,040 → 00:42:40,990 are going to are going to bend toward
00:42:41,000 → 00:42:44,430 may. Right? So okay. All right.
00:42:44,440 → 00:42:46,030 Otherwise, if you just look at that
00:42:46,040 → 00:42:48,390 example, blaptomenoi
Section 115: 00:42:48,400 – 00:43:19,270
00:42:48,400 → 00:42:51,870 you know, being hit being hit is what
00:42:51,880 → 00:42:54,910 that means. Being hit ouk esthelomen,
00:42:54,920 → 00:42:55,910 you know,
00:42:56,640 → 00:42:58,670 don't wish we don't want to send any
00:42:58,680 → 00:43:00,270 sort of gifts,
00:43:00,280 → 00:43:02,350 you know, since we're since we're being
00:43:02,360 → 00:43:04,710 blaptomenoi, you know.
00:43:04,720 → 00:43:08,190 Um you can just see that that is setting
00:43:08,200 → 00:43:10,670 up the circumstances.
00:43:10,680 → 00:43:11,990 Right? It's just setting up the
00:43:12,000 → 00:43:14,670 circumstances. When we're hurt when
00:43:14,680 → 00:43:16,390 we're harmed, we don't want to do
00:43:16,400 → 00:43:19,270 things, right? So
Section 116: 00:43:19,280 – 00:43:59,710
00:43:19,280 → 00:43:21,470 Yeah. Nice.
00:43:25,200 → 00:43:28,710 Okay. Fantastic. And you may be tempted,
00:43:28,720 → 00:43:31,270 by the way, that esthelomen you may be
00:43:31,280 → 00:43:33,150 tempted to think that that is in the
00:43:33,160 → 00:43:35,190 past tense cuz it's got an epsilon on
00:43:35,200 → 00:43:37,710 the front of it. Looks like an augment.
00:43:37,720 → 00:43:39,350 But don't be.
00:43:39,360 → 00:43:41,270 Yeah, be careful. Don't because the verb
00:43:41,280 → 00:43:42,790 can be either
00:43:42,800 → 00:43:45,190 esthelo in the first principal part or
00:43:45,200 → 00:43:47,030 it's just thelo. Some
00:43:47,040 → 00:43:50,990 >> Yeah. Some dialects use the epsilon.
00:43:51,000 → 00:43:53,550 Some don't. So whatever, I don't care.
00:43:53,560 → 00:43:55,310 It's, you know, either way. As long as
00:43:55,320 → 00:43:57,030 we know it's not a
00:43:57,040 → 00:43:59,710 it's not a past tense. Okay, sorry. Go
Section 117: 00:43:59,720 – 00:44:49,070
00:43:59,720 → 00:44:01,830 ahead now. These adjectives you've got
00:44:01,840 → 00:44:04,030 some a new adjective.
00:44:04,040 → 00:44:07,430 Yeah, so this ad- adjective
00:44:12,240 → 00:44:16,950 Um all every whole. And it below it'll
00:44:16,960 → 00:44:19,110 tell the difference
00:44:19,120 → 00:44:21,190 of how it appears.
00:44:24,840 → 00:44:28,349 it has the same endings as aorist
00:44:28,359 → 00:44:30,349 uh principle
00:44:30,359 → 00:44:32,910 the our participle um
00:44:32,920 → 00:44:36,349 active. So the masculine and the and the
00:44:36,359 → 00:44:38,550 neuter stems are
00:44:38,560 → 00:44:42,430 um neuter and the feminine has the
00:44:42,440 → 00:44:45,470 sigma. And
Section 118: 00:44:51,110 – 00:45:03,510
00:44:51,110 → 00:44:51,120 The In the observation, it talks about
00:44:51,120 → 00:44:54,230 how to just take note of the
00:44:54,240 → 00:44:56,590 accent changes and that the data, for
00:44:56,600 → 00:44:59,830 whatever reason, has no tau with long
Section 119: 00:45:04,470 – 00:45:32,630
00:45:05,800 → 00:45:09,070 in predicate position with an article,
00:45:09,080 → 00:45:12,270 so down below the different
00:45:12,280 → 00:45:14,670 to distinguish between all every and
00:45:17,040 → 00:45:19,950 pas pas pan
00:45:21,080 → 00:45:23,470 the adjective
00:45:23,480 → 00:45:25,390 has an article
00:45:30,120 → 00:45:32,630 Right? So
Section 120: 00:45:32,640 – 00:45:35,990
Section 121: 00:45:38,110 – 00:45:55,590
00:45:38,110 → 00:45:38,120 It says all the teachers or all the
00:45:38,120 → 00:45:42,590 land. So you see it has hoi or hai.
00:45:45,359 → 00:45:47,070 in the singular
00:45:47,080 → 00:45:50,310 without the ar- the article
00:45:52,120 → 00:45:55,590 pas anthropos
Section 122: 00:45:55,600 – 00:46:10,150
00:45:55,600 → 00:45:59,790 this means just every. So every man.
00:45:59,800 → 00:46:03,030 And then the attributive, it means
00:46:03,040 → 00:46:06,070 whole. So it's he pasa
Section 123: 00:46:11,790 – 00:46:43,150
00:46:11,790 → 00:46:11,800 And it um
00:46:11,800 → 00:46:14,790 and it and focuses on the the whole or
00:46:14,800 → 00:46:17,590 the group, the entirety.
00:46:18,920 → 00:46:22,230 All every or the whole. It can mean
00:46:22,240 → 00:46:24,070 all three of those things depending on
00:46:24,080 → 00:46:25,510 how you use it. It's usually kind of
00:46:25,520 → 00:46:27,550 intuitive, too. Like
00:46:27,560 → 00:46:30,590 you know, pas anthropos, right? Every
00:46:30,600 → 00:46:32,910 person as opposed to all person, you
00:46:32,920 → 00:46:34,390 know, you try all person there, you're
00:46:34,400 → 00:46:36,430 like, "No, that didn't work."
00:46:36,440 → 00:46:38,710 Right? Didn't fit the concept. So yeah,
00:46:38,720 → 00:46:41,390 good good good. And now you know the
00:46:41,400 → 00:46:43,150 grammar of how to use it when it's
Section 124: 00:46:43,160 – 00:47:16,110
00:46:43,160 → 00:46:44,349 What's the difference when it's a
00:46:44,359 → 00:46:45,750 predicate, you know what I mean, as
00:46:45,760 → 00:46:46,910 opposed to attributive. [clears throat]
00:46:48,240 → 00:46:51,830 Good. Fantastic. Okay. Now give me your
00:46:51,840 → 00:46:54,430 how you feel about the entire chapter
00:46:54,440 → 00:46:58,710 and let's do some exercises um if we
00:46:58,720 → 00:47:00,150 don't find any notes. Were there any
00:47:00,160 → 00:47:02,070 good notes in here in the vocabulary
00:47:03,320 → 00:47:06,790 Um I mean, I didn't really read those
00:47:06,800 → 00:47:09,870 that much. Yeah, I didn't either. I just
00:47:09,880 → 00:47:12,349 skimmed through them, so Yeah, no. They
00:47:12,359 → 00:47:14,390 They might be a couple things.
00:47:14,400 → 00:47:16,110 But They told us when we did the course
Section 125: 00:47:16,120 – 00:47:55,070
00:47:16,120 → 00:47:17,349 just to read them for your own
00:47:17,359 → 00:47:19,190 information, but it's not like it's you
00:47:20,240 → 00:47:23,910 not like it's absolutely necessary. Um
00:47:23,920 → 00:47:27,630 >> Yeah. Look Look at the note that says uh
00:47:27,640 → 00:47:31,310 hate and hoia. This is on 219.
00:47:31,320 → 00:47:33,510 About halfway down the page. Note that
00:47:33,520 → 00:47:35,830 hate and hoia
00:47:35,840 → 00:47:38,310 with causal participles both indicate
00:47:38,320 → 00:47:41,270 the speaker's taking responsibility.
00:47:41,280 → 00:47:44,110 Contrast this with hos
00:47:44,120 → 00:47:45,670 which indicates that the cause or
00:47:45,680 → 00:47:47,750 purpose is that of the subject of the
00:47:47,760 → 00:47:50,590 sentence or someone else important in
00:47:50,600 → 00:47:52,070 the sentence.
00:47:52,080 → 00:47:53,310 Right? Isn't that [laughter] weird?
00:47:53,320 → 00:47:55,070 Again, it's like
Section 126: 00:47:55,080 – 00:48:25,950
00:47:55,080 → 00:47:58,270 it's like I still don't quite understand
00:47:58,280 → 00:48:00,870 what this is doing.
00:48:00,880 → 00:48:04,349 I can't put it into English, right?
00:48:04,359 → 00:48:06,150 How do you translate How do you How do
00:48:06,160 → 00:48:07,830 you translate that Okay, this is
00:48:07,840 → 00:48:10,630 indicated it's the idea of someone else
00:48:10,640 → 00:48:12,190 important in the sentence. It's not the
00:48:12,200 → 00:48:13,990 idea of the speaker.
00:48:14,000 → 00:48:15,270 I mean, how are you going to relate
00:48:15,280 → 00:48:17,750 that? It's It's just, you know,
00:48:17,760 → 00:48:19,030 Yeah. It's
00:48:19,040 → 00:48:20,830 It's an art. And you'll see when you're
00:48:20,840 → 00:48:22,190 doing it, you'll see, "Oh, I can
00:48:22,200 → 00:48:23,790 emphasize this a little bit here or
00:48:23,800 → 00:48:25,950 something," you know, just to make it
Section 127: 00:48:25,960 – 00:48:38,110
00:48:29,400 → 00:48:32,670 Uh let's see. Yeah, I don't see any
00:48:32,680 → 00:48:35,670 other notes that really stick out.
Section 128: 00:48:41,150 – 00:49:02,470
00:48:41,150 → 00:48:41,160 Right, but we know that. Uh
00:48:41,160 → 00:48:43,630 cognates. Okay.
00:48:43,640 → 00:48:46,310 And what Oh, they have oinos in the end.
00:48:46,320 → 00:48:48,990 Oinos, yeah. Wine. They They just give
00:48:49,000 → 00:48:53,070 you the oinom. Now, it is uh
00:48:53,080 → 00:48:55,950 We should have a digamma on the front of
00:48:55,960 → 00:48:57,270 that one. I have a
00:48:58,400 → 00:49:02,470 Let me check LSJ really quick.
Section 129: 00:49:02,480 – 00:49:07,870
Section 130: 00:49:10,430 – 00:49:15,030
00:49:10,430 → 00:49:10,440 That would make sense.
Section 131: 00:49:16,830 – 00:49:20,550
00:49:16,830 → 00:49:16,840 Let me see.
00:49:16,840 → 00:49:20,550 Oh god, where is it?
Section 132: 00:49:22,470 – 00:49:26,230
00:49:22,470 → 00:49:22,480 They changed their format for some
00:49:22,480 → 00:49:23,750 reason. I don't know why. They I think
Section 133: 00:49:28,990 – 00:49:36,510
00:49:28,990 → 00:49:29,000 I think they're uh I don't know.
00:49:29,000 → 00:49:30,910 Look at this. I hope you can see this
00:49:30,920 → 00:49:32,510 what I've got. Have you got oinos on
00:49:32,520 → 00:49:33,270 your page?
00:49:33,280 → 00:49:36,510 >> I see. Yeah.
Section 134: 00:49:39,950 – 00:49:49,430
00:49:39,950 → 00:49:39,960 Look for the digamma, goddammit. I want
00:49:39,960 → 00:49:41,790 to see if this is
00:49:41,800 → 00:49:43,590 if this is
00:49:43,600 → 00:49:45,110 This is some good information, though.
00:49:45,120 → 00:49:46,630 Look, they've got the
Section 135: 00:49:51,350 – 00:50:13,679
00:49:51,350 → 00:49:51,360 like 3/4 of the way down that first
00:49:51,360 → 00:49:52,670 paragraph.
00:49:52,680 → 00:49:56,110 See the in vino veritas, the in in wine
00:49:56,120 → 00:49:59,230 is truth. Um there's the Greek phrase
00:50:00,400 → 00:50:02,870 that the Romans are stealing it from.
00:50:02,880 → 00:50:05,110 So, you if you thought in vino veritas
00:50:06,040 → 00:50:07,870 was Latin, you're full of [\h__\h] because
00:50:07,880 → 00:50:10,790 it was far earlier in the Greek oinos
00:50:10,800 → 00:50:13,679 kai alatheia.
Section 136: 00:50:13,689 – 00:50:53,910
00:50:13,689 → 00:50:15,390 >> [laughter]
00:50:15,400 → 00:50:17,470 >> They say they say wine and
00:50:17,480 → 00:50:21,150 >> Number I found the digamma number three.
00:50:21,160 → 00:50:23,190 Did you find it? Where is it? Number
00:50:24,880 → 00:50:27,390 Yep, there it is.
00:50:27,400 → 00:50:29,670 Yeah, I knew it was in there.
00:50:29,680 → 00:50:31,310 I knew it was in there. Why? Because in
00:50:31,320 → 00:50:33,350 the Latin, look what it does. It becomes
00:50:33,360 → 00:50:36,550 vinum. They took the word and the Greek
00:50:36,560 → 00:50:39,670 digamma is the
00:50:39,680 → 00:50:44,070 Latin V, which is actually the U. Right?
00:50:44,080 → 00:50:46,390 Which is actually the U.
00:50:46,400 → 00:50:48,750 So, it's the upsilon.
00:50:48,760 → 00:50:51,630 Right? But it looks like a V to us. And
00:50:51,640 → 00:50:53,910 that's why people who take medieval
Section 137: 00:50:53,920 – 00:51:26,385
00:50:55,480 → 00:51:00,430 um will say in vino veritas, right? Um
00:51:00,440 → 00:51:02,590 cuz they'll pronounce their V's, they'll
00:51:02,600 → 00:51:06,310 pronounce their classical U's like V's.
00:51:06,320 → 00:51:07,750 But that's just how you can tell
00:51:07,760 → 00:51:09,750 somebody's
00:51:09,760 → 00:51:11,350 somebody's got shite medieval
00:51:11,360 → 00:51:14,270 pronunciation for Latin. Anyway,
00:51:15,720 → 00:51:19,750 But part half of classics is Latin, so
00:51:19,760 → 00:51:20,870 we have to do
00:51:20,880 → 00:51:22,790 we have to give it over to those people,
00:51:22,800 → 00:51:24,150 too, even though they're mostly just
00:51:24,160 → 00:51:25,730 stealing from the Greek.
00:51:25,740 → 00:51:26,385 >> [snorts]
Section 138: 00:51:26,395 – 00:51:27,070
Section 139: 00:51:27,080 – 00:51:55,710
00:51:28,080 → 00:51:30,310 In vino veritas, there's a lot thasos.
00:51:30,320 → 00:51:33,230 Here's some places that it's produced.
00:51:33,240 → 00:51:35,670 They talk about see Chios here. They
00:51:35,680 → 00:51:37,150 talk about
00:51:37,160 → 00:51:40,310 Chios, the island, as a place that, you
00:51:40,320 → 00:51:42,950 know, is is well known. Chian wine and
00:51:42,960 → 00:51:44,510 all that kind of stuff.
00:51:44,520 → 00:51:47,390 Thasian wine from Thasos, that's another
00:51:48,920 → 00:51:50,790 Oh, look, they used the resin as a
00:51:50,800 → 00:51:52,710 preservative with their
00:51:52,720 → 00:51:55,710 pissitis oinos.
Section 140: 00:51:55,720 – 00:52:17,710
00:51:57,720 → 00:51:59,870 Nice. See all the things that you know
00:51:59,880 → 00:52:02,230 we ought to throw some of this at Luke.
00:52:02,240 → 00:52:04,310 Which by the way, I think he's going to
00:52:04,320 → 00:52:07,950 he's just responded. He's I think we
00:52:07,960 → 00:52:11,230 Yeah, the show pulled him out of his
00:52:11,240 → 00:52:14,110 pulled him out of his hole.
00:52:14,120 → 00:52:17,710 I think he's trying to
Section 141: 00:52:22,110 – 00:52:27,710
00:52:22,110 → 00:52:22,120 I think he's
00:52:22,120 → 00:52:23,710 >> was so funny.
00:52:23,720 → 00:52:24,681 That was great.
00:52:24,691 → 00:52:27,710 >> [clears throat]
Section 142: 00:52:29,550 – 00:52:35,350
00:52:29,550 → 00:52:29,560 >> Do you think?
Section 143: 00:52:38,550 – 00:53:02,590
00:52:38,550 → 00:52:38,560 Oh god, what yeah.
00:52:38,560 → 00:52:41,910 Oh, whatever. He's going to want rules.
00:52:41,920 → 00:52:45,350 [\h__\h] you. Translate the [\h__\h] Greek.
00:52:45,360 → 00:52:48,230 Mhm. Rules for translation? What What
00:52:48,240 → 00:52:50,390 are the [\h__\h] What [\h__\h] rules for
00:52:50,400 → 00:52:52,070 translation?
00:52:52,080 → 00:52:55,070 Could there possibly be? Translate it.
00:52:55,080 → 00:52:57,710 That's the [\h__\h] rule.
00:52:57,720 → 00:53:02,590 Oh my god.
Section 144: 00:53:05,110 – 00:53:29,990
00:53:05,110 → 00:53:05,120 I think it'd be fair for each of us to
00:53:05,120 → 00:53:07,870 be able to nominate authors.
00:53:07,880 → 00:53:09,870 Are you [\h__\h] sh
00:53:09,880 → 00:53:11,030 You know what he's trying to do? He's
00:53:11,040 → 00:53:12,510 trying to limit He's trying to say,
00:53:12,520 → 00:53:14,990 "Okay, let's talk about a couple of
00:53:15,000 → 00:53:17,470 authors." No, no, no, no, no. We're not
00:53:17,480 → 00:53:19,150 talking a couple of authors. We're going
00:53:19,160 → 00:53:20,950 to look at every goddamn Christing that
00:53:20,960 → 00:53:23,590 ever existed and to find out what the
00:53:23,600 → 00:53:25,270 [\h__\h] a Christing is. I don't care if
00:53:25,280 → 00:53:27,990 it's in a New Testament author, I don't
00:53:28,000 → 00:53:29,990 care if it's in goddamn Aeschylus, I
Section 145: 00:53:30,000 – 00:53:54,750
00:53:30,000 → 00:53:31,990 don't care if it's Homer, I don't care
00:53:32,000 → 00:53:36,110 if it's some church father.
00:53:36,120 → 00:53:38,590 We [\h__\h] look it up.
00:53:38,600 → 00:53:39,950 We have them. I've got all the
00:53:39,960 → 00:53:42,550 references. Bam, bam, bam. I can just
00:53:42,560 → 00:53:44,950 call them all up. Bam, bam, bam.
00:53:44,960 → 00:53:47,150 [\h__\h] this guy. My god, what do you
00:53:47,160 → 00:53:48,590 think, Madelaine?
00:53:48,600 → 00:53:50,110 Yeah, I don't think he knows how to do
00:53:50,120 → 00:53:52,070 the work,
00:53:52,080 → 00:53:54,750 to be honest.
Section 146: 00:53:54,760 – 00:54:35,230
00:53:54,760 → 00:53:57,870 The judges. Now he wants judges.
00:53:59,520 → 00:54:02,830 Yeah, you're going to need judges.
00:54:02,840 → 00:54:04,790 Given your clear confidence in your
00:54:04,800 → 00:54:07,550 Greek abilities, I'm sure [\h__\h] you.
00:54:07,560 → 00:54:11,270 Here's the parameters, [\h__\h] Greek.
00:54:11,280 → 00:54:13,750 Okay? That's all and we're there to talk
00:54:13,760 → 00:54:17,510 about Christing, so good luck. Go.
00:54:19,200 → 00:54:21,390 Where's the
00:54:21,400 → 00:54:22,670 But it's good that he said he's going to
00:54:22,680 → 00:54:24,390 do it cuz I honestly I don't think he'd
00:54:25,920 → 00:54:27,750 Cuz he's going to get embarrassed, dog.
00:54:27,760 → 00:54:30,310 I'm telling you there it's not easy to
00:54:30,320 → 00:54:31,830 It's not difficult to embarrass
00:54:31,840 → 00:54:32,950 yourself.
00:54:32,960 → 00:54:35,230 Madelaine, you've been doing this now,
Section 147: 00:54:35,240 – 00:55:06,990
00:54:35,240 → 00:54:37,150 right? In every chapter you come across
00:54:37,160 → 00:54:40,150 new sentences and you get a sense of
00:54:40,160 → 00:54:42,070 you get a sense of kind of fright and
00:54:42,080 → 00:54:43,590 terror at the new sentence cuz you know
00:54:43,600 → 00:54:45,270 there's going to be new [\h__\h] in there
00:54:45,280 → 00:54:46,950 that they're throwing in there to try to
00:54:46,960 → 00:54:49,790 get you to practice it, right? Yeah,
00:54:49,800 → 00:54:51,402 that's how I feel right now.
00:54:51,412 → 00:54:51,870 >> [laughter]
00:54:51,880 → 00:54:55,070 >> Yeah. Well, magnus magnify that feeling
00:54:55,080 → 00:54:58,550 by about a thousand times because now
00:54:58,560 → 00:55:01,750 you're a PhD in it and you're going to
00:55:01,760 → 00:55:03,510 have to go on
00:55:03,520 → 00:55:06,990 international stage and do it live
Section 148: 00:55:07,000 – 00:55:42,790
00:55:07,000 → 00:55:09,110 with any of the authors that come up.
00:55:09,120 → 00:55:11,150 You know how [\h__\h] hard that is?
00:55:11,160 → 00:55:15,030 That's really, really hard. And he knows
00:55:15,040 → 00:55:16,870 it. That's why he wants to limit it to
00:55:16,880 → 00:55:19,510 certain authors and [\h__\h] like that. No,
00:55:19,520 → 00:55:21,310 dummy, it's just a Christing. Just
00:55:21,320 → 00:55:22,910 whoever.
00:55:22,920 → 00:55:26,390 Mhm. No. Oh my god.
00:55:26,400 → 00:55:27,950 Okay, anyway.
00:55:27,960 → 00:55:30,870 Anyway, he'll get it as he'll get it.
00:55:30,880 → 00:55:32,950 All right. Now,
00:55:32,960 → 00:55:35,430 let's go back to the text, which I think
00:55:35,440 → 00:55:36,990 was right here. I hope you
00:55:37,000 → 00:55:40,030 hope you can still see my text.
00:55:40,040 → 00:55:42,790 Okay. And you
Section 149: 00:55:42,800 – 00:56:05,470
00:55:42,800 → 00:55:44,270 Go ahead.
00:55:44,280 → 00:55:46,750 Oh, I was saying I could see it.
00:55:46,760 → 00:55:48,990 Okay. Now, explain a couple of these
00:55:49,000 → 00:55:51,190 sentences to me, please.
00:55:51,200 → 00:55:54,110 Pick out a couple of these ex exerci Oh,
00:55:54,120 → 00:55:55,710 wait, wait, wait. Before we do the
00:55:55,720 → 00:55:58,110 exercises, I know you're teaching
00:55:59,520 → 00:56:03,110 Can we go to Which one is this? That's
00:56:03,120 → 00:56:05,470 the anthology.
Section 150: 00:56:05,480 – 00:56:15,550
00:56:05,480 → 00:56:15,550 Ah, [sighs] it's not that exciting.
Section 151: 00:56:18,430 – 00:56:40,030
00:56:18,430 → 00:56:18,440 How about Solon? Let's do this fragment
00:56:18,440 → 00:56:21,270 of Solon on page 229.
00:56:21,640 → 00:56:23,430 >> Read Read that and tell me what it
00:56:23,440 → 00:56:25,990 means. It's got a nice participle in it,
00:56:26,000 → 00:56:29,349 didaskomenos, right?
00:56:29,359 → 00:56:31,070 Yeah. Yeah.
00:56:31,080 → 00:56:32,590 Didaskomenos.
00:56:36,800 → 00:56:40,030 dia bola
Section 152: 00:56:40,040 – 00:56:44,990
00:56:40,040 → 00:56:42,190 didaskomenos.
Section 153: 00:56:47,110 – 00:56:53,190
00:56:47,120 → 00:56:53,190 shows me that it's um
Section 154: 00:56:55,199 – 00:57:00,950
00:56:55,209 → 00:57:00,950 >> [clears throat]
Section 155: 00:57:02,310 – 00:57:10,110
Section 156: 00:57:12,830 – 00:57:43,830
00:57:12,840 → 00:57:14,590 And if you've forgotten, by the way, I
00:57:14,600 → 00:57:15,750 forgot to tell you. I should have told
00:57:15,760 → 00:57:17,830 you this like two units ago.
00:57:18,240 → 00:57:21,110 >> But if if you've forgotten the word,
00:57:21,120 → 00:57:23,470 like didasko, just say you Let's just do
00:57:23,480 → 00:57:25,030 this do this exercise. Say you've
00:57:25,040 → 00:57:27,270 forgotten what didasko is. You have a
00:57:27,280 → 00:57:30,950 dictionary a Greek lexicon in the back.
00:57:30,960 → 00:57:33,870 Look it up. Look it up and and find it.
00:57:33,880 → 00:57:36,390 So, I want to actually do this.
00:57:36,400 → 00:57:38,910 Go as exercise.
00:57:38,920 → 00:57:41,670 Quick, first one to the page wins.
00:57:41,680 → 00:57:43,830 Didasko is what we're looking for. First
Section 157: 00:57:43,840 – 00:57:52,150
00:57:43,840 → 00:57:46,270 one First one who gets there wins. Oh
00:57:46,280 → 00:57:48,310 god, it's going to take me forever if I
00:57:48,320 → 00:57:52,150 don't do this.
Section 158: 00:57:53,990 – 00:57:58,590
00:57:53,990 → 00:57:54,000 Did you get there? No. No, no, no. I'm
00:57:54,000 → 00:57:55,270 going to be
Section 159: 00:57:59,990 – 00:58:24,830
00:57:59,990 → 00:58:00,000 Here it is.
00:58:00,000 → 00:58:01,750 Uh Scott found it.
00:58:01,760 → 00:58:04,270 I got it. Did you, dammit? Oh, I was so
00:58:04,280 → 00:58:06,750 close. There I am now.
00:58:06,760 → 00:58:08,750 Okay. So,
00:58:08,760 → 00:58:10,630 Yeah, so look at what they give you, at
00:58:10,640 → 00:58:12,190 least, you know? They give you all six
00:58:12,200 → 00:58:13,790 principal parts for it. That's pretty
00:58:14,920 → 00:58:18,110 Then they tell you what it means.
00:58:18,120 → 00:58:19,990 All right?
00:58:20,000 → 00:58:24,830 And yeah. Yeah. Teach.
Section 160: 00:58:24,840 – 00:58:44,590
00:58:24,840 → 00:58:27,190 Teach in the active, taught in the
00:58:27,200 → 00:58:30,230 passive, right? Middle cause someone to
00:58:30,240 → 00:58:32,670 be taught. Good. Okay, now how do we fit
00:58:32,680 → 00:58:34,230 that in? Oh, goddammit, now we got to go
00:58:34,240 → 00:58:37,830 back to What was that? 229,
00:58:37,840 → 00:58:44,590 I think.
Section 161: 00:58:47,550 – 00:58:54,790
00:58:47,550 → 00:58:47,560 Yeah. 229.
00:58:47,560 → 00:58:54,790 Didaskomenos.
Section 162: 00:59:23,590 – 00:59:29,150
Section 163: 00:59:50,950 – 00:59:54,470
00:59:50,950 → 00:59:50,960 >> So long, early 6th century. Oh god.
Section 164: 00:59:55,550 – 01:00:01,670
00:59:55,560 → 00:59:58,270 didaskomenos.
00:59:59,266 → 00:59:59,270 >> [clears throat]
Section 165: 01:00:23,390 – 01:00:27,470
Section 166: 01:00:29,030 – 01:00:36,190
01:00:29,030 → 01:00:29,040 Give me a second. I'm going to check I'm
01:00:29,040 → 01:00:31,310 going to put my phone
01:00:31,320 → 01:00:36,190 No, you're good.
Section 167: 01:01:42,750 – 01:02:11,430
01:01:43,240 → 01:01:44,430 >> All right.
01:01:44,440 → 01:01:44,990 I don't [clears throat] know.
01:01:45,000 → 01:01:46,550 >> Where's your main verb? Where's your
01:01:46,560 → 01:01:52,750 main verb? Well, it's My main verb is
01:01:52,760 → 01:01:55,590 didaskō, right?
01:01:55,600 → 01:01:58,230 No, it's not. Yeah, your participle
01:01:58,240 → 01:02:00,190 can't your participle can't be your main
01:02:00,200 → 01:02:03,670 verb. You got to You got to have a nice
01:02:03,680 → 01:02:05,230 >> didaskomenos
01:02:05,240 → 01:02:08,230 is the main verb then?
01:02:08,240 → 01:02:11,430 No, didaskō didaskō.
Section 168: 01:02:11,440 – 01:02:58,070
01:02:17,920 → 01:02:21,190 No, I think she got confused.
01:02:21,200 → 01:02:23,110 You were saying
01:02:23,120 → 01:02:28,630 I said so the the main verb is didaskō?
01:02:29,120 → 01:02:32,070 >> Or it's not. Oh, okay. Yeah, it is. Oh,
01:02:32,080 → 01:02:33,430 oh, you were confused by what I Oh, I'm
01:02:33,440 → 01:02:36,350 sorry. Yeah, didaskō is the main verb.
01:02:36,360 → 01:02:38,630 And then didaskomenos
01:02:38,640 → 01:02:39,990 is just your
01:02:40,000 → 01:02:40,390 participle.
01:02:40,400 → 01:02:42,270 >> is the participle, right?
01:02:42,280 → 01:02:45,670 Yeah, but I was
01:02:45,680 → 01:02:48,390 trying to remember. So, is it's just
01:02:48,400 → 01:02:52,390 didaskomen which is um um in like
Section 169: 01:02:59,390 – 01:03:06,350
01:02:59,400 → 01:03:02,110 I'm kind of confused as to how to tell
01:03:02,120 → 01:03:06,350 between like
Section 170: 01:03:07,830 – 01:03:48,870
01:03:07,830 → 01:03:07,840 I don't know.
01:03:07,840 → 01:03:09,630 So, no, that's okay. That's okay. It's
01:03:09,640 → 01:03:13,270 didaskō the verb, right, to teach. And
01:03:13,280 → 01:03:16,790 this is with the omenos
01:03:18,280 → 01:03:20,510 is going to be either a middle or
01:03:20,520 → 01:03:23,910 passive. And didaskō is the present,
01:03:23,920 → 01:03:26,510 right? So, this looks like a present
01:03:26,520 → 01:03:30,030 stem with a middle passive participle
01:03:30,040 → 01:03:32,510 ending on it. So, just use it in the
01:03:32,520 → 01:03:35,030 present. It's happening
01:03:35,040 → 01:03:37,310 it's happening because it's in the
01:03:37,320 → 01:03:39,950 present. It's happening at the same time
01:03:39,960 → 01:03:42,550 as your main verb, which is didaskō.
01:03:42,560 → 01:03:45,870 Didaskō is also in the present, right?
01:03:45,880 → 01:03:48,870 Yeah. So, just translate as a present.
Section 171: 01:03:48,880 – 01:04:12,110
01:03:48,880 → 01:03:51,390 Didaskō Just translate that by itself.
01:03:51,400 → 01:03:55,190 Didaskō. Okay. Growing old.
01:03:55,200 → 01:03:57,110 Yes, it's first person singular, right?
01:03:57,120 → 01:04:00,110 Yes, I'm growing old. Good.
01:04:00,120 → 01:04:02,630 And what's happening while I'm growing
01:04:02,640 → 01:04:04,590 old? The participle is going to tell you
01:04:04,600 → 01:04:06,550 what he's doing or what's being done to
01:04:06,560 → 01:04:08,870 him while he's growing old. He's what?
01:04:08,880 → 01:04:12,110 Didaskomenos.
Section 172: 01:04:17,270 – 01:04:32,190
01:04:17,270 → 01:04:17,280 He's um he's teaching himself?
01:04:17,280 → 01:04:19,230 Yeah, do you think that's a middle or a
01:04:19,240 → 01:04:21,550 passive? Depends if you think that's a
01:04:21,560 → 01:04:22,870 middle or passive.
01:04:22,880 → 01:04:25,844 >> Yeah, that's true. Um
01:04:25,854 → 01:04:32,190 >> [snorts]
Section 173: 01:04:38,190 – 01:04:42,990
01:04:38,190 → 01:04:38,200 I I thought it was uh
Section 174: 01:04:45,590 – 01:04:52,190
01:04:45,590 → 01:04:45,600 Oh, it's it's passive, right?
01:04:45,600 → 01:04:47,870 Okay, try it as passive. Try translating
Section 175: 01:04:53,190 – 01:04:57,830
01:04:53,200 → 01:04:57,830 growing old.
Section 176: 01:05:00,270 – 01:05:28,750
01:05:01,880 → 01:05:04,470 having been taught or having learned.
01:05:04,480 → 01:05:06,590 >> Yeah. Right? In the state right now in
01:05:06,600 → 01:05:08,190 the present. I mean, I'm translating
01:05:08,200 → 01:05:10,110 this as a perfect, but in the state
01:05:10,120 → 01:05:12,630 right now of the present. Didaskō as I
01:05:12,640 → 01:05:14,270 grow old.
01:05:14,280 → 01:05:16,630 Right? I am learning polla, always
01:05:16,640 → 01:05:20,030 learning polla, many things, right? Many
01:05:20,040 → 01:05:21,870 things you're being taught, right? I'm
01:05:21,880 → 01:05:24,070 being taught many things.
01:05:24,080 → 01:05:26,030 Yeah, good.
01:05:26,040 → 01:05:28,750 Good, fantastic.
Section 177: 01:05:28,760 – 01:06:09,230
01:05:28,760 → 01:05:31,190 Now, it could also it could also be
01:05:31,200 → 01:05:32,870 didaskomenos
01:05:32,880 → 01:05:35,390 with a in the middle.
01:05:35,400 → 01:05:37,430 Right? It could be in the middle.
01:05:37,440 → 01:05:39,430 Putting something So, putting someone
01:05:39,440 → 01:05:42,630 else into a place of instruction.
01:05:45,760 → 01:05:48,950 Always teaching many things. Always
01:05:48,960 → 01:05:52,390 causing many things to be instructed. It
01:05:52,400 → 01:05:54,830 doesn't quite fit. So, that's why I'm
01:05:54,840 → 01:05:57,510 not doing it translating it that way.
01:05:57,520 → 01:05:59,910 Good. He's He's celebrating the fact
01:05:59,920 → 01:06:01,990 that he learns [\h__\h] as he as he gets
01:06:02,000 → 01:06:03,510 old, right?
01:06:04,105 → 01:06:05,349 >> [laughter]
01:06:05,359 → 01:06:09,230 >> Right? Okay, fantastic. Um
Section 178: 01:06:09,240 – 01:06:19,270
01:06:09,240 → 01:06:11,950 let's do the let's do the exercises that
01:06:11,960 → 01:06:13,470 you want to
01:06:13,480 → 01:06:19,270 um focus on.
Section 179: 01:06:20,750 – 01:06:36,990
01:06:20,750 → 01:06:20,760 Are you there? I think I lost you for
01:06:20,760 → 01:06:22,430 >> Yeah. What?
01:06:22,440 → 01:06:22,950 I'm here.
01:06:22,960 → 01:06:25,390 >> I lost you for a second.
01:06:27,520 → 01:06:29,830 Let's go to the exercises.
Section 180: 01:06:40,190 – 01:06:56,190
01:06:40,190 → 01:06:40,200 Uh I have no preference
01:06:40,200 → 01:06:43,270 to which one we we could we could do.
Section 181: 01:06:58,230 – 01:07:04,670
01:06:58,230 → 01:06:58,240 We could do like number nine or
01:06:58,240 → 01:07:04,670 something. That looks like a um
Section 182: 01:07:06,349 – 01:07:11,230
01:07:06,349 → 01:07:06,359 interesting one.
Section 183: 01:07:13,510 – 01:07:29,630
01:07:13,510 → 01:07:13,520 Number nine, let's do it. Do you like
01:07:13,520 → 01:07:17,150 that one? Okay, read it. Read it to me
01:07:17,160 → 01:07:19,310 and translate it and tell me how you're
01:07:19,320 → 01:07:21,910 translating it. Go ahead.
01:07:21,920 → 01:07:23,390 All right.
01:07:25,640 → 01:07:27,790 didaskei
01:07:27,800 → 01:07:29,630 didaskeis
Section 184: 01:07:29,640 – 01:07:58,310
01:07:29,640 → 01:07:32,550 didaskei
01:07:32,560 → 01:07:36,349 de ta biblia ta
01:07:36,359 → 01:07:39,870 hupo gar son
01:07:39,880 → 01:07:41,550 poiounton
01:07:42,800 → 01:07:45,790 omenon graphomenon
Section 185: 01:08:01,430 – 01:08:14,390
01:08:01,430 → 01:08:01,440 Um first I just
01:08:01,440 → 01:08:04,870 noticed the
01:08:04,880 → 01:08:07,510 the verb, so
01:08:07,520 → 01:08:09,550 didaskei
Section 186: 01:08:20,829 – 01:08:29,390
01:08:20,829 → 01:08:20,839 And then you can see that the
01:08:20,839 → 01:08:23,150 didaskeis
01:08:23,160 → 01:08:26,550 is a participle and it's negative.
Section 187: 01:08:32,190 – 01:08:49,789
01:08:32,200 → 01:08:33,950 omenos Do you want to know that?
01:08:33,960 → 01:08:35,950 >> Okay, where did where did we see that
01:08:35,960 → 01:08:38,110 negative participle?
01:08:38,120 → 01:08:41,590 Negative or negative maybe
01:08:41,600 → 01:08:43,749 >> circumstantial, right?
01:08:43,759 → 01:08:46,270 Okay, let's go back there in the text.
01:08:46,280 → 01:08:47,990 Go back there to the page. Take me to
Section 188: 01:08:49,799 – 01:08:52,870
Section 189: 01:09:04,630 – 01:09:25,709
01:09:04,640 → 01:09:07,070 Page 216 there in the middle and Look at
01:09:07,080 → 01:09:09,110 number six.
01:09:09,120 → 01:09:10,510 Negative with all circumstantial
01:09:10,520 → 01:09:12,070 participles.
01:09:12,080 → 01:09:14,190 Is ou except for those conditionals. So,
01:09:14,200 → 01:09:16,070 that like the example we've got me
01:09:16,080 → 01:09:17,910 blaptomenoi.
01:09:17,920 → 01:09:19,670 I just want you to see that look, our
01:09:19,680 → 01:09:21,789 example in number nine is using the same
01:09:21,799 → 01:09:25,709 structure as this. Yeah.
Section 190: 01:09:25,719 – 01:09:41,309
01:09:25,719 → 01:09:26,910 All right.
01:09:28,000 → 01:09:28,710 So, it's
01:09:28,720 → 01:09:29,789 >> Yeah, it's the very first
01:09:29,799 → 01:09:31,430 >> kind of conditional. It's kind of
01:09:31,440 → 01:09:33,870 conditional not being harmed or if we
01:09:33,880 → 01:09:34,710 are not harmed.
01:09:34,720 → 01:09:37,110 >> Oh, then it So, yeah, it would be
01:09:37,120 → 01:09:38,789 conditional because it's talking
01:09:38,799 → 01:09:41,309 specifically about
Section 191: 01:09:41,319 – 01:09:44,710
Section 192: 01:09:47,390 – 01:09:52,910
01:09:47,390 → 01:09:47,400 Yeah, about the
01:09:47,400 → 01:09:48,763 teaching, right?
01:09:48,773 → 01:09:49,269 >> [clears throat]
01:09:49,279 → 01:09:52,910 >> Yes, good.
Section 193: 01:10:11,150 – 01:10:19,830
01:10:11,150 → 01:10:11,160 So, what is
01:10:11,160 → 01:10:13,630 What is do lao u sas? Let's Let's get
01:10:14,760 → 01:10:17,230 Let's get that tamped down.
Section 194: 01:10:22,310 – 01:10:33,750
Section 195: 01:10:53,070 – 01:10:55,670
01:10:53,070 → 01:10:53,080 It doesn't work as a conditional, does
Section 196: 01:10:57,950 – 01:11:25,790
01:10:57,950 → 01:10:57,960 I'm trying to find it. I'm I'm sorry.
01:10:57,960 → 01:10:59,590 >> Yeah, it's hard it's hard. This one's
01:10:59,600 → 01:11:00,870 hard. You have to pick a really hard
01:11:01,640 → 01:11:04,030 Let me Let me help out a little bit.
01:11:04,040 → 01:11:06,310 Let me help out a little bit. Before
01:11:06,320 → 01:11:08,390 Before you slip, continue slip, go to
01:11:08,400 → 01:11:10,230 your main verb.
01:11:10,240 → 01:11:12,910 You know that do lao u sas is a
01:11:12,920 → 01:11:15,390 participle, so that's not going to work.
01:11:15,800 → 01:11:18,950 >> Right? di dax e, that's a that's a nice
01:11:18,960 → 01:11:21,750 one. That That'll work as a main verb,
01:11:21,760 → 01:11:25,790 right? Cuz it's indicative. di das go di
Section 197: 01:11:25,800 – 01:11:54,550
01:11:25,800 → 01:11:29,750 dax o, so it's a future.
01:11:30,200 → 01:11:32,190 >> It's so he
01:11:32,200 → 01:11:34,430 o a s a, it's a third person singular.
01:11:34,440 → 01:11:37,630 He, she, or it He, she, or it will
01:11:39,440 → 01:11:42,670 Now, look the tas there.
01:11:42,680 → 01:11:45,030 That's a that's an accusative, so it
01:11:45,040 → 01:11:46,630 looks like it should be the object of
01:11:46,640 → 01:11:48,030 something.
01:11:48,040 → 01:11:52,110 So, try that the tas do lao u sas
Section 198: 01:11:54,560 – 01:12:18,510
01:11:54,560 → 01:11:57,510 participle that is standing in the place
01:11:57,520 → 01:12:00,510 of a noun. tas, those who
01:12:00,520 → 01:12:03,070 may do lao u sas, those who do not
01:12:03,080 → 01:12:07,670 serve. Those who are not servants.
01:12:07,680 → 01:12:10,710 Right? He will instruct
01:12:10,720 → 01:12:12,870 those who are not servants. He will
01:12:12,880 → 01:12:15,270 teach them. What will he teach them? ta
01:12:15,280 → 01:12:18,510 biblia, the books. books
Section 199: 01:12:18,520 – 01:12:40,030
01:12:18,520 → 01:12:21,070 Yeah. The books. What kind of books? ta
01:12:21,080 → 01:12:24,510 biblia ta graphomena
01:12:24,520 → 01:12:26,870 It's like books
01:12:26,880 → 01:12:28,950 graphomena
01:12:28,960 → 01:12:31,310 written written Yeah.
01:12:31,320 → 01:12:33,550 >> written
01:12:33,560 → 01:12:36,910 written what? hupo agathon poieton
Section 200: 01:12:41,270 – 01:13:17,630
01:12:41,280 → 01:12:42,710 a good poet
01:12:42,720 → 01:12:45,470 Excellent. In the plural, by good poets.
01:12:45,480 → 01:12:46,830 poets, yes
01:12:46,840 → 01:12:47,670 >> Gorgeous.
01:12:47,680 → 01:12:50,950 Gorgeous, gorgeous, gorgeous.
01:12:50,960 → 01:12:53,670 Oh god, there's a kai pair.
01:12:53,680 → 01:12:56,790 Oh god, they They added a kai pair plus
01:12:56,800 → 01:12:59,150 a whole new thing.
01:12:59,160 → 01:13:00,670 What is that one?
01:13:00,680 → 01:13:03,430 >> kai pair. No, no, no. Here, do 13. Oh.
01:13:03,440 → 01:13:05,920 Come on, man. Do 13.
01:13:05,930 → 01:13:06,190 >> [snorts]
01:13:06,200 → 01:13:08,470 >> All right. uh
01:13:09,880 → 01:13:12,790 toi tou pas san
Section 201: 01:13:17,640 – 01:13:22,470
01:13:17,640 → 01:13:19,550 o gei ron
Section 202: 01:13:24,510 – 01:13:30,350
Section 203: 01:13:32,950 – 01:13:40,590
01:13:32,950 → 01:13:32,960 a re te, is that the word for
01:13:32,960 → 01:13:35,190 excellence? I was going to make sure.
01:13:35,200 → 01:13:36,550 Yes, it is.
01:13:36,560 → 01:13:40,590 >> Okay. Um
Section 204: 01:14:01,350 – 01:14:10,766
01:14:01,350 → 01:14:01,360 speaking
01:14:01,360 → 01:14:04,230 to someone
Section 205: 01:14:17,590 – 01:14:45,870
01:14:17,590 → 01:14:17,600 >> It's short and looks easy, but it's not.
01:14:17,600 → 01:14:19,710 I want to give you a clue.
01:14:19,720 → 01:14:21,830 I want to give you a clue. As you start
01:14:21,840 → 01:14:24,230 As you start slip cuz you're going to
01:14:24,240 → 01:14:26,430 look at it and you say the a re te
01:14:26,440 → 01:14:29,430 Right? Virtue of some sort, toy. Fine,
01:14:29,440 → 01:14:31,750 we'll leave that. to, wait, I got a
01:14:31,760 → 01:14:33,870 definite article there. Well, where's
01:14:33,880 → 01:14:35,830 the Where What What noun is going with
01:14:37,160 → 01:14:40,030 Um it's not pas san
01:14:40,040 → 01:14:43,310 and it's not kho ran. Right? Cuz kho ran
01:14:43,320 → 01:14:45,870 is feminine. It'd be tain kho ran. It
Section 206: 01:14:45,880 – 01:15:06,670
01:14:45,880 → 01:14:48,710 wouldn't be to. So, what is the to going
01:14:48,720 → 01:14:51,230 with there? Well, look at the soi son.
01:14:51,240 → 01:14:55,030 That looks like the verb soi son. But it
01:14:55,040 → 01:14:57,070 looks like it's been put in It looks
01:14:57,080 → 01:14:59,350 like it's been put into the imperfect
01:14:59,360 → 01:15:00,910 without an augment. And you're like,
01:15:00,920 → 01:15:03,030 what the hell is that? No, no, no. Those
01:15:03,040 → 01:15:06,670 participles don't have augments. So,
Section 207: 01:15:06,680 – 01:15:50,950
01:15:06,680 → 01:15:09,710 that is That is the participle. That's
01:15:09,720 → 01:15:11,750 the participle. Okay.
01:15:13,002 → 01:15:13,510 >> [clears throat]
01:15:13,520 → 01:15:15,510 >> And it's neuter because you have to
01:15:15,520 → 01:15:18,510 coming before it that's neuter. It's to
01:15:18,520 → 01:15:19,910 soi son.
01:15:19,920 → 01:15:22,350 Right? The saving
01:15:22,360 → 01:15:24,910 Right? The saving or saving
01:15:24,920 → 01:15:26,710 >> of the
01:15:28,080 → 01:15:30,630 Um Yeah, good. Of the what country? pas
01:15:30,640 → 01:15:33,150 san kho ran of
01:15:33,160 → 01:15:35,710 What is pas san?
01:15:35,720 → 01:15:38,510 pas pas upon all
01:15:38,520 → 01:15:40,950 all, yeah. Okay, that's the new one.
01:15:42,040 → 01:15:43,750 >> It's the one that comes Wait a minute.
01:15:43,760 → 01:15:45,910 It's the one that comes
01:15:45,920 → 01:15:47,710 Right? It's the one that comes Look at
01:15:47,720 → 01:15:50,950 it. It's It comes between the article
Section 208: 01:15:50,960 – 01:16:11,950
01:15:50,960 → 01:15:54,990 and it's noun. So, go back up Go back up
01:15:55,000 → 01:15:56,590 to the page.
01:15:56,800 → 01:15:59,110 >> Go back up to the page and show me.
01:15:59,120 → 01:16:01,070 Which one is it?
01:16:03,160 → 01:16:06,830 Which example is it?
01:16:08,230 → 01:16:08,240 Oh, it's
01:16:08,240 → 01:16:11,950 uh um it's
Section 209: 01:16:11,960 – 01:16:32,630
01:16:14,200 → 01:16:18,190 predicate position, right? So, the Is it
01:16:18,200 → 01:16:19,830 in the predicate? No, it's not in the
01:16:19,840 → 01:16:21,630 predicate. Wait.
01:16:21,640 → 01:16:23,790 It's in the attributive. No, it's in the
01:16:23,800 → 01:16:25,990 attributive. It's be It's between the
01:16:26,000 → 01:16:27,470 article and it's noun.
01:16:27,480 → 01:16:30,910 >> it is Yeah, pas san, so that one is
01:16:30,920 → 01:16:32,630 attributive.
Section 210: 01:16:32,640 – 01:16:59,950
01:16:32,640 → 01:16:35,710 And so like the whole, right?
01:16:35,720 → 01:16:37,350 >> Good. There you go.
01:16:37,360 → 01:16:38,790 >> Okay. There you go. Perfect.
01:16:38,800 → 01:16:41,390 >> That's That's what I thought, but Yeah.
01:16:41,400 → 01:16:43,750 What Did I correct Did I correct you
01:16:43,760 → 01:16:44,950 wrong? I maybe I thought you said
01:16:44,960 → 01:16:46,658 something else. Okay. Oh. Maybe
01:16:46,668 → 01:16:47,750 [clears throat] I said something else.
01:16:47,760 → 01:16:49,630 Okay, good. I I don't
01:16:49,640 → 01:16:52,110 And what do you do with the o gei ron at
01:16:52,120 → 01:16:53,990 the end of it? o gei ron
01:16:54,000 → 01:16:56,350 It's like that's vocative, right?
01:16:57,520 → 01:16:59,950 So, it's
Section 211: 01:16:59,960 – 01:17:16,350
01:16:59,960 → 01:17:03,670 saying oh man
01:17:04,920 → 01:17:08,030 Yeah. Yeah, hey old
01:17:08,040 → 01:17:09,830 Hey old guy.
01:17:09,840 → 01:17:12,750 Hey old guy. the
Section 212: 01:17:18,510 – 01:17:23,550
01:17:18,510 → 01:17:18,520 the saving of the
01:17:18,520 → 01:17:21,270 Yeah, the saving of the
Section 213: 01:17:27,230 – 01:17:39,470
01:17:27,230 → 01:17:27,240 of the whole country
01:17:27,880 → 01:17:33,550 >> is is excellent? Is excellence, yes.
01:17:33,560 → 01:17:35,710 Saving the whole country, you could just
01:17:35,720 → 01:17:39,470 say saving to
Section 214: 01:17:41,030 – 01:18:15,350
01:17:41,030 → 01:17:41,040 Saving the whole
01:17:41,040 → 01:17:43,630 is virtue, right? Old man. What is that?
01:17:43,640 → 01:17:45,750 Stupid old man.
01:17:48,160 → 01:17:49,790 Okay. Now,
01:17:49,800 → 01:17:52,550 look at 14 now. 14 takes the pa since
01:17:52,560 → 01:17:54,670 we're talking about pa san there and
01:17:54,680 → 01:17:56,030 we're focusing [clears throat] on pas
01:17:56,040 → 01:17:59,990 pas upon. Um look at pan ta below that
01:18:01,480 → 01:18:05,070 So, look that's the same exact structure
01:18:05,080 → 01:18:07,870 as number 13. It's the same. You've got
01:18:07,880 → 01:18:11,110 an invisible verb to be and your subject
01:18:12,719 → 01:18:15,350 pe pragmena
Section 215: 01:18:15,360 – 01:18:42,110
01:18:15,360 → 01:18:19,070 All right? The things having been done.
01:18:19,080 → 01:18:21,590 That's what pe pragmena does. It's a
01:18:21,600 → 01:18:24,750 perfect participle, so it's having been
01:18:24,760 → 01:18:26,110 something.
01:18:26,120 → 01:18:28,990 Right? The things having been something.
01:18:29,000 → 01:18:31,510 The things done theois. Now, what would
01:18:31,520 → 01:18:32,750 you do with
01:18:32,760 → 01:18:35,430 with the theois? things
01:18:35,440 → 01:18:36,950 Uh okay.
01:18:36,960 → 01:18:38,790 That's a
Section 216: 01:18:49,799 – 01:19:06,230
01:18:49,799 → 01:18:49,809 The things
01:18:49,809 → 01:18:51,430 uh The things >> [laughter]
01:18:51,430 → 01:18:51,440 >> [laughter]
01:18:51,440 → 01:18:54,870 >> The things done Remember when
01:18:54,880 → 01:18:56,590 >> Okay, yeah. Doing When you have a
01:18:56,600 → 01:18:59,830 perfect When you have a perfect, your
01:18:59,840 → 01:19:03,230 agent will be in the dative. The things
01:19:03,240 → 01:19:06,230 having been done
Section 217: 01:19:06,240 – 01:19:15,310
01:19:07,480 → 01:19:08,990 by theois
01:19:09,000 → 01:19:15,310 by gods Yes. Um are what? Are what?
Section 218: 01:19:15,320 – 01:19:56,110
01:19:21,400 → 01:19:24,230 not just not all just.
01:19:24,240 → 01:19:27,070 Yes, good. Right?
01:19:28,640 → 01:19:30,830 Right? All of the things done by the
01:19:30,840 → 01:19:34,230 gods uk dikaya are not just.
01:19:34,240 → 01:19:36,430 Are not just, right? With an invisible
01:19:36,440 → 01:19:38,470 verb to be, but it's a question. Look
01:19:38,480 → 01:19:40,630 those bastards, they put a semicolon on
01:19:40,640 → 01:19:41,430 the end.
01:19:41,440 → 01:19:45,390 >> So, it's asking, are are the all are the
01:19:45,400 → 01:19:47,110 things done by
01:19:47,120 → 01:19:48,870 the gods
01:19:53,280 → 01:19:56,110 Nice. Gorgeous.
Section 219: 01:19:56,120 – 01:20:29,910
01:19:56,120 → 01:19:58,030 Gorgeous. Okay.
01:19:59,080 → 01:20:01,030 and I want to do one of these. Okay,
01:20:01,040 → 01:20:03,070 look at number 18.
01:20:05,160 → 01:20:06,670 Okay. Now, they're going to try to
01:20:07,760 → 01:20:10,990 butt hump us on this one. Okay.
01:20:11,000 → 01:20:14,270 You I want you to go back to hotay.
01:20:14,280 → 01:20:16,190 And I want you to tell me how I'm going
01:20:16,200 → 01:20:17,710 to I want you to tell me how to use
01:20:17,720 → 01:20:19,870 hotay again because that's what they got
01:20:21,440 → 01:20:23,230 All right. Well,
01:20:23,240 → 01:20:24,950 Flip back. What page was it? And just
01:20:24,960 → 01:20:27,190 read read read it to me.
01:20:27,200 → 01:20:29,910 Where am I? Where is my
Section 220: 01:20:29,920 – 01:20:38,750
01:20:29,920 → 01:20:31,910 Where's the hotay?
01:20:31,920 → 01:20:33,110 I think it's the
Section 221: 01:20:40,950 – 01:20:57,670
01:20:40,950 → 01:20:40,960 Here it is.
01:20:40,960 → 01:20:44,710 Yeah. Okay, so hotay. Oh, yes.
01:20:44,720 → 01:20:46,830 Um, the speaker is asserting that this
01:20:46,840 → 01:20:48,230 is the cause.
01:20:48,240 → 01:20:51,710 It's the the causal
01:20:51,720 → 01:20:53,350 stating the cause is the own
01:20:53,360 → 01:20:57,670 responsibility.
Section 222: 01:21:32,750 – 01:21:37,590
01:21:32,750 → 01:21:32,760 So, it would be braso is uh
Section 223: 01:21:39,430 – 01:21:55,710
01:21:39,430 → 01:21:39,440 Yeah, so
01:21:39,440 → 01:21:40,790 It's a participle.
01:21:40,800 → 01:21:43,790 >> things. Yeah.
01:21:43,800 → 01:21:45,670 Yeah. Yeah, yeah. You do want to you got
01:21:45,680 → 01:21:49,270 it doing bad things, right? Hotay. Hotay
01:21:49,280 → 01:21:50,990 doing bad things, right?
01:21:51,000 → 01:21:55,710 >> Um, so
Section 224: 01:21:57,670 – 01:22:18,510
01:21:57,670 → 01:21:57,680 But, that's what I don't understand. How
01:21:57,680 → 01:22:01,150 to do that. That's all right. Um Yeah.
01:22:01,160 → 01:22:03,470 What is hotay again? How how are we
01:22:03,480 → 01:22:05,910 translating hotay?
01:22:05,920 → 01:22:08,990 You said Did you say causal?
01:22:10,560 → 01:22:13,310 Yeah. So, how do you turn this into a
01:22:16,560 → 01:22:18,510 because?
Section 225: 01:22:18,520 – 01:22:35,430
01:22:18,520 → 01:22:20,550 Oh, thus, right?
01:22:20,560 → 01:22:22,350 It's not what it says. How about do they
01:22:22,360 → 01:22:25,110 No, do they give you because?
01:22:25,120 → 01:22:28,710 Um, yeah. Oh, for the reason that
01:22:29,040 → 01:22:29,750 >> Yeah.
Section 226: 01:22:37,470 – 01:22:55,630
01:22:37,470 → 01:22:37,480 Oh, I thought it was Oh, yeah, it is, I
01:22:37,480 → 01:22:39,310 guess, for host.
01:22:39,320 → 01:22:41,470 That's what I wrote down. So, it's
01:22:42,640 → 01:22:45,350 Yeah, it's I'm telling you that's
01:22:45,360 → 01:22:47,750 That's why I'm telling you to flip back
01:22:47,760 → 01:22:49,790 because there is so much information. It
01:22:49,800 → 01:22:51,510 sounds like you made it.
01:22:51,520 → 01:22:53,390 It sounds like you made a cheat sheet,
01:22:53,400 → 01:22:55,630 right? Yeah.
Section 227: 01:22:55,640 – 01:23:09,270
01:22:56,120 → 01:22:57,670 >> For those, yeah.
01:22:57,680 → 01:23:01,270 So, we can use hotay as because, and
01:23:01,280 → 01:23:03,750 we've got to remember I as a speaker am
01:23:03,760 → 01:23:06,550 asserting that this is the cause.
Section 228: 01:23:12,150 – 01:23:15,030
01:23:12,150 → 01:23:12,160 Yeah. Is that Is that okay?
01:23:12,160 → 01:23:15,030 Okay. Yeah. Is that Is that okay? Okay.
Section 229: 01:23:16,590 – 01:23:33,590
01:23:16,590 → 01:23:16,600 So, back we go. What number was that?
01:23:16,600 → 01:23:18,070 I'm sorry.
01:23:18,080 → 01:23:20,030 Uh 18. [clears throat]
01:23:22,440 → 01:23:23,950 There we go.
01:23:25,760 → 01:23:28,190 I'm causing the bad things
Section 230: 01:23:35,430 – 01:23:41,950
01:23:35,440 → 01:23:41,950 I don't know, because
Section 231: 01:23:46,070 – 01:24:07,790
01:23:46,070 → 01:23:46,080 Because you're doing so poorly.
01:23:46,080 → 01:23:49,110 Because you're doing so poorly, friends.
01:23:49,120 → 01:23:50,870 Oh, friends.
01:23:51,520 → 01:23:52,550 >> Yeah.
01:23:52,560 → 01:23:55,430 Because you're doing so poorly, friends
01:23:55,440 → 01:23:58,350 argomen.
01:23:58,360 → 01:24:01,710 Argomen mate to ed ain't it?
01:24:01,720 → 01:24:04,310 What is that? Argomen. It looks like a
01:24:04,320 → 01:24:07,790 some kind of subjunctive.
Section 232: 01:24:07,800 – 01:24:42,550
01:24:07,800 → 01:24:09,790 Yeah. What kind of What kind of
01:24:09,800 → 01:24:13,670 subjunctives are we going to have there?
01:24:13,680 → 01:24:15,550 We're going to have We get Think of your
01:24:15,560 → 01:24:18,750 independence. Let's try a hortatory.
01:24:20,360 → 01:24:22,790 Let's not Yeah, go ahead.
01:24:22,800 → 01:24:26,310 >> know how the hortatory work yet.
01:24:26,320 → 01:24:28,150 It's just let us. You just translate it
01:24:28,160 → 01:24:30,750 as let us. Let us do something.
01:24:30,760 → 01:24:32,990 Right? Argomen. Let us
01:24:33,000 → 01:24:34,950 lead, but then there's a mate in front
01:24:36,240 → 01:24:40,150 Let's not bring peace or
01:24:40,160 → 01:24:42,550 douleomen.
Section 233: 01:24:42,560 – 01:25:20,550
01:24:44,160 → 01:24:47,750 Or Yeah, and let's
01:24:47,760 → 01:24:50,470 Yeah, let's not become slave.
01:24:50,480 → 01:24:50,990 Become slave.
01:24:51,000 → 01:24:53,830 >> Yeah. Enslaved to whom? Kakois.
01:24:53,840 → 01:24:56,310 Kakois, the bad the evil.
01:24:56,320 → 01:24:58,910 Yeah, good. Good. Good.
01:25:00,760 → 01:25:02,070 Yeah. That
01:25:03,360 → 01:25:05,350 got me took me out.
01:25:05,360 → 01:25:07,870 Yeah. Because of you're doing poorly,
01:25:07,880 → 01:25:10,270 right? Now, uh assumedly I'm not
01:25:10,280 → 01:25:11,950 bringing this myself. It's not the
01:25:11,960 → 01:25:14,790 assertion myself, right? Oh, god.
01:25:14,800 → 01:25:16,190 Seriously, I have to take that into
01:25:16,200 → 01:25:20,550 consideration? That's colossally stupid.
Section 234: 01:25:20,560 – 01:25:47,670
01:25:22,160 → 01:25:24,270 I have No, it is. It's absolutely
01:25:24,280 → 01:25:26,350 For an English speaker, it's too much
01:25:26,360 → 01:25:27,870 information.
01:25:27,880 → 01:25:29,710 And I'm telling you when we translate
01:25:29,720 → 01:25:32,310 Greek when we translate Greek, English
01:25:32,320 → 01:25:34,590 speakers will leave out this
01:25:34,600 → 01:25:36,150 information.
01:25:36,160 → 01:25:37,950 And it's not just these. It's a lot of
01:25:37,960 → 01:25:40,670 the particles don't come across in
01:25:40,680 → 01:25:42,830 translation. They absolutely do just
01:25:42,840 → 01:25:44,630 people just don't
01:25:44,640 → 01:25:47,670 um translate them.
Section 235: 01:25:47,680 – 01:26:01,630
01:25:51,000 → 01:25:53,710 I just want to identify
01:25:53,720 → 01:26:01,630 No, that one's got a quote.
Section 236: 01:26:04,390 – 01:26:34,790
01:26:04,390 → 01:26:04,400 How about number 32?
01:26:04,400 → 01:26:07,630 I just want you to see in number 32
01:26:07,640 → 01:26:10,270 didaskomenoi.
01:26:10,680 → 01:26:12,070 >> Didaskomenoi.
01:26:12,080 → 01:26:15,350 Yeah, it's another one of the same
01:26:15,360 → 01:26:18,390 >> Mhm. Right? Mhm. It's a participle.
01:26:18,400 → 01:26:20,070 Right? Participle. It's plural
01:26:20,080 → 01:26:21,950 nominative plural,
01:26:21,960 → 01:26:25,070 right? Masculine. So, nominative plural
01:26:25,080 → 01:26:28,630 masculine, and it's a present stem. Mhm.
01:26:28,640 → 01:26:29,910 So, it's going to it's going to be
01:26:29,920 → 01:26:32,950 taking place contemporary with the verb.
Section 237: 01:26:34,800 – 01:27:02,590
01:26:34,800 → 01:26:37,510 So, being taught. Didaskomenoi. Being
01:26:39,360 → 01:26:41,750 >> Hupo ton agathon. What would you Being
01:26:41,760 → 01:26:43,310 taught by what?
01:26:43,320 → 01:26:45,430 By the good.
01:26:45,440 → 01:26:48,470 Yeah, by the good. Yeah, being taught by
01:26:48,480 → 01:26:51,190 the good oh adelphoi.
01:26:51,200 → 01:26:52,870 Oh, adelphoi. What do you get for that?
01:26:52,880 → 01:26:55,030 >> Oh, brothers.
01:26:55,040 → 01:26:58,070 Yes. Mhm. Being taught by the good what?
01:26:58,080 → 01:27:02,590 Grapsesthe. Grapsesthe.
Section 238: 01:27:03,950 – 01:27:09,750
01:27:03,950 → 01:27:03,960 Oh, it's one
01:27:04,340 → 01:27:05,230 >> [sighs]
Section 239: 01:27:15,990 – 01:27:23,110
01:27:15,990 → 01:27:16,000 Grapsesthe. We got to identify
Section 240: 01:27:26,710 – 01:27:41,950
01:27:26,710 → 01:27:26,720 Right? Gra grapsesthe.
01:27:26,720 → 01:27:28,710 Um, it would be
01:27:28,720 → 01:27:30,430 the same thing.
01:27:30,440 → 01:27:32,510 >> What principal part? Identify it first.
01:27:32,520 → 01:27:34,750 It's from grapho, right? So, what
01:27:34,760 → 01:27:37,070 principal part is this?
01:27:37,080 → 01:27:41,950 Grapho grapso egrapsa gegrapha gegrammai
Section 241: 01:27:41,960 – 01:28:05,900
01:27:41,960 → 01:27:43,830 egraphen.
01:27:43,840 → 01:27:46,030 So, what
01:27:46,040 → 01:27:48,870 It looks like a future, doesn't it?
01:27:50,440 → 01:27:52,630 Okay, but it's got an esthe ending on
01:27:52,640 → 01:27:54,470 it. It's got an esthe ending on it. So,
01:27:54,480 → 01:27:56,730 it's not active.
01:27:56,740 → 01:27:57,150 >> [snorts]
01:27:57,160 → 01:27:59,630 >> It could be but well, it can't be
01:27:59,640 → 01:28:01,709 passive. Why why can't it can't it be
01:28:01,719 → 01:28:03,110 passive?
01:28:03,880 → 01:28:05,900 because although it has a passive
Section 242: 01:28:05,910 – 01:28:07,030
01:28:05,910 → 01:28:07,030 [laughter]
Section 243: 01:28:07,040 – 01:28:42,350
01:28:07,040 → 01:28:08,510 although it has a passive looking
01:28:08,520 → 01:28:11,750 ending, um the future passive as you
01:28:13,200 → 01:28:16,310 right? The future passive is based on
01:28:16,320 → 01:28:18,990 the sixth principal part
01:28:19,000 → 01:28:19,950 that you
01:28:19,960 → 01:28:21,150 add an a to
01:28:21,160 → 01:28:24,150 Yeah, that you add an a to sigma two.
01:28:24,160 → 01:28:25,750 And then your endings. And this isn't
01:28:25,760 → 01:28:27,990 that. So, it's got to be a
01:28:28,000 → 01:28:31,630 >> isn't it? No. No. No. It's got It's got
01:28:31,640 → 01:28:33,950 to be a future middle.
01:28:33,960 → 01:28:35,790 Future middle.
01:28:35,800 → 01:28:38,630 Yeah, I need to memorize those better.
01:28:38,640 → 01:28:40,590 So, [snorts] go back. Wait wait. No, I
01:28:40,600 → 01:28:42,350 want you to see this.
Section 244: 01:28:42,360 – 01:29:04,350
01:28:42,360 → 01:28:45,670 Go back to your
01:28:45,680 → 01:28:49,150 chart that has your middle verbs in unit
01:28:49,160 → 01:28:50,950 seven. I told you how important this
01:28:50,960 → 01:28:52,390 chart was.
01:28:52,400 → 01:28:54,390 This is This is exactly what I mean.
01:28:54,400 → 01:28:56,709 It's on page
01:28:56,719 → 01:29:01,310 Um, hang on. I've got it right here.
Section 245: 01:29:04,360 – 01:29:13,310
01:29:04,360 → 01:29:06,670 168. God damn it. How did you get there?
01:29:06,680 → 01:29:08,790 I don't know.
01:29:08,800 → 01:29:13,310 Yeah. Or is it the 172 chart?
Section 246: 01:29:15,550 – 01:29:35,990
01:29:17,440 → 01:29:19,470 Blah blah. No.
01:29:19,480 → 01:29:21,350 Where'd you go?
01:29:23,040 → 01:29:25,550 No, it's right in the beginning.
01:29:26,880 → 01:29:28,190 Let's see.
01:29:28,200 → 01:29:30,270 Is that big chart?
01:29:30,280 → 01:29:33,350 Here. Oh, I got it. It's on page 168.
01:29:33,360 → 01:29:35,990 You're right. 168.
Section 247: 01:29:36,000 – 01:29:45,350
01:29:36,000 → 01:29:39,230 Okay. Look at the grapho now.
01:29:39,240 → 01:29:41,110 Grapho on the active side means to
01:29:42,200 → 01:29:45,350 Graphomai
Section 248: 01:29:47,350 – 01:30:10,750
01:29:47,350 → 01:29:47,360 To know down.
01:29:47,360 → 01:29:50,470 Yeah, to indict. You could You could try
01:29:52,360 → 01:29:54,790 You know, something like that. Okay, now
01:29:54,800 → 01:29:57,830 what page is this bastard on again?
01:29:59,720 → 01:30:02,270 226. See how we all We always go
01:30:02,280 → 01:30:03,710 flipping back and forth. And people who
01:30:03,720 → 01:30:05,990 get the digital version tell me this is
Section 249: 01:30:16,190 – 01:30:24,030
01:30:16,190 → 01:30:16,200 Okay, so you sit there and try to figure
01:30:16,200 → 01:30:17,750 out how to translate that thing. I got
Section 250: 01:30:27,270 – 01:30:42,710
01:30:27,270 → 01:30:27,280 What What number?
01:30:27,280 → 01:30:30,190 We will call out 32.
01:30:30,200 → 01:30:32,510 The page is 226.
01:30:32,520 → 01:30:34,470 32. I got it.
01:30:34,480 → 01:30:37,070 So it'd be
01:30:39,837 → 01:30:42,710 >> [snorts]
Section 251: 01:30:45,350 – 01:30:59,790
01:30:45,350 → 01:30:45,360 >> You will cause you will cause to be
01:30:45,360 → 01:30:47,350 written.
01:30:47,360 → 01:30:52,270 Yeah. Or you will indict. Yeah. Yeah.
01:30:52,280 → 01:30:59,790 Okay. The
Section 252: 01:31:05,190 – 01:31:11,150
01:31:05,190 → 01:31:05,200 Yeah, good.
01:31:05,200 → 01:31:11,150 The speakers who what?
Section 253: 01:31:13,670 – 01:31:23,190
01:31:13,670 → 01:31:13,680 The speakers notice the twos after the
01:31:13,680 → 01:31:16,430 ray toras. Your speakers. Notice it's
01:31:16,440 → 01:31:20,030 twos again. So the twos The second twos
01:31:20,040 → 01:31:23,190 there is telling you
Section 254: 01:31:25,910 – 01:31:50,550
01:31:25,910 → 01:31:25,920 is going with pay thol men who
01:31:25,920 → 01:31:30,790 Yeah, rhetoricians who pay thol men who
01:31:33,840 → 01:31:36,270 persuading who persuade Good, who are
01:31:36,280 → 01:31:38,350 persuaded. And it's
01:31:38,360 → 01:31:42,030 Yeah, by people who buy toys agathois
01:31:42,040 → 01:31:45,350 may. By people who are may agathois.
01:31:45,360 → 01:31:47,430 Not good.
01:31:47,440 → 01:31:50,550 Yeah, exactly. Exactly, right?
Section 255: 01:31:50,560 – 01:32:20,110
01:31:50,560 → 01:31:51,230 Right? [laughter]
01:31:53,000 → 01:31:55,710 Oh god. And what is the charge? You said
01:31:55,720 → 01:31:58,870 you will indict. You indict somebody in
01:31:58,880 → 01:32:01,390 Greek on a charge of something in the
01:32:01,400 → 01:32:02,910 genitive.
01:32:02,920 → 01:32:05,310 That's why that little word That's why
01:32:05,320 → 01:32:08,590 that little word doron is sitting there.
01:32:08,600 → 01:32:12,430 Doron. It's of the gifts. Of the gifts.
01:32:12,440 → 01:32:14,510 Okay. Yeah. You're going to indict
01:32:14,520 → 01:32:20,110 somebody on the charge of
Section 256: 01:32:22,070 – 01:32:49,710
01:32:22,070 → 01:32:22,080 It's It's the charge of the gifts, which
01:32:22,080 → 01:32:24,110 is really like We can translate that
01:32:24,120 → 01:32:26,270 into English as bribery if you wanted
01:32:26,280 → 01:32:29,190 to. Oh, that makes sense.
01:32:29,200 → 01:32:30,030 Yeah. [laughter]
01:32:30,040 → 01:32:32,710 You get it. Okay. Put everything down
01:32:32,720 → 01:32:34,350 now. Let me see if I can get rid of this
01:32:35,320 → 01:32:37,190 show you. We started way too late
01:32:37,200 → 01:32:40,590 tonight. I'm sorry. I don't want to
01:32:40,600 → 01:32:42,590 I don't want to do that again.
01:32:42,600 → 01:32:43,910 I don't want to start that late again.
01:32:43,920 → 01:32:45,870 But the Friday night Lady Babylon, I
01:32:45,880 → 01:32:47,670 think, has to be
01:32:47,680 → 01:32:49,710 Am I muted?
Section 257: 01:32:49,720 – 01:33:21,470
01:32:50,840 → 01:32:52,150 Can you hear me?
01:32:52,160 → 01:32:53,430 I can hear you.
01:32:53,440 → 01:32:55,830 Oh, the Okay, so the Friday night Lady
01:32:55,840 → 01:32:58,030 Babylon has to be
01:32:58,040 → 01:32:59,750 I have to start that thing at 7:00, but
01:32:59,760 → 01:33:02,910 I don't have to go as long as I did. So
01:33:02,920 → 01:33:05,910 I'd like to start earlier because
01:33:05,920 → 01:33:08,190 you're you're way later than I am and
01:33:08,200 → 01:33:10,510 I'm sure you're tired and I'm later. And
01:33:10,520 → 01:33:12,910 it's like 1:00 here.
01:33:12,920 → 01:33:15,310 Yeah, I know. That's It's It's way late.
01:33:15,320 → 01:33:18,390 So we'll figure that out. But you got
01:33:18,400 → 01:33:21,470 through the entire unit. And you did
Section 258: 01:33:21,480 – 01:33:55,710
01:33:21,480 → 01:33:24,950 exercises. I would like to We had one
01:33:24,960 → 01:33:28,510 practice with hate. I would love to have
01:33:28,520 → 01:33:32,190 maybe four more practices with chi pair
01:33:32,200 → 01:33:35,630 and hos. So you can see how those are
01:33:35,640 → 01:33:38,950 played out. If we had another 2 hours,
01:33:38,960 → 01:33:40,750 that's all we would do is go through
01:33:40,760 → 01:33:43,470 those examples and you would feel very
01:33:43,480 → 01:33:45,870 comfortable. Now with the material. If
01:33:45,880 → 01:33:47,870 we had If we had about another 2 hours
01:33:47,880 → 01:33:50,110 practice, which we don't. There's no way
01:33:50,120 → 01:33:52,110 we can do that in this four-week course.
01:33:52,120 → 01:33:54,030 So you're going to have to do that
01:33:54,040 → 01:33:55,710 yourself.
Section 259: 01:33:55,720 – 01:34:24,630
01:33:55,720 → 01:33:58,830 Okay. And then tomorrow before we
01:33:58,840 → 01:34:02,230 continue on or next time we meet, before
01:34:02,240 → 01:34:05,270 we continue on with the unit, ask me
01:34:05,280 → 01:34:06,750 questions.
01:34:06,760 → 01:34:09,070 Right? Remind me. Hey, you know, we need
01:34:09,080 → 01:34:10,750 to do a couple more of these exercises.
01:34:10,760 → 01:34:12,630 Can we do a couple more?
01:34:12,640 → 01:34:14,830 Right? Let's do those and then jump into
01:34:14,840 → 01:34:16,430 the next unit. Now, I don't want you to
01:34:16,440 → 01:34:19,070 have to teach me this next unit. I don't
01:34:19,080 → 01:34:20,830 want you to have to teach me this next
01:34:20,840 → 01:34:22,590 unit, okay? I'm going to do the teaching
01:34:22,600 → 01:34:24,630 cuz I want to give you a little break.
Section 260: 01:34:24,640 – 01:34:48,150
01:34:24,640 → 01:34:26,270 So what I want you to do is I want you
01:34:26,280 → 01:34:29,550 to read just do three four more Just do
01:34:29,560 → 01:34:32,710 four. Four more examples that have a chi
01:34:32,720 → 01:34:36,070 pair or hos hos pair, one of the one of
01:34:36,080 → 01:34:39,550 those in the sentence so that we can
01:34:39,560 → 01:34:43,030 practice it before and then I'll go on
01:34:43,040 → 01:34:48,150 to teach unit nine. Okay? And trust me,
Section 261: 01:34:48,160 – 01:35:32,270
01:34:48,160 → 01:34:52,390 I know that participles is a huge unit.
01:34:52,400 → 01:34:55,630 Right? Participles is is huge.
01:34:55,640 → 01:34:58,510 But you're going to be practicing
01:34:58,520 → 01:35:02,070 participles now every time we translate.
01:35:02,080 → 01:35:05,470 They're going to be everywhere. Okay? So
01:35:05,480 → 01:35:07,710 you're going to get plenty
01:35:07,720 → 01:35:10,030 of practice with them as long as you've
01:35:10,040 → 01:35:13,670 seen a few a half a dozen
01:35:13,680 → 01:35:15,750 circumstantial participles, you'll know
01:35:15,760 → 01:35:18,230 how to use them. No problem.
01:35:18,240 → 01:35:21,310 Fantastic. Okay. Do you have any
01:35:21,320 → 01:35:23,910 questions for me tonight?
01:35:23,920 → 01:35:26,550 No, I think this unit will be helpful
01:35:26,560 → 01:35:30,030 for translating stuff in the wild and
01:35:30,040 → 01:35:32,270 yeah. understanding
Section 262: 01:35:32,280 – 01:36:00,830
01:35:32,280 → 01:35:33,990 that better.
01:35:34,000 → 01:35:36,110 Good. And you know what? I've got it. If
01:35:36,120 → 01:35:37,510 I had a lot more time, I'd I'd be
01:35:37,520 → 01:35:40,590 bringing in text every time. We can't We
01:35:40,600 → 01:35:42,150 There's no way I can get you through the
01:35:42,160 → 01:35:44,230 material and do that. It's It's one
01:35:44,240 → 01:35:46,070 thing I learned about this. That first
01:35:46,080 → 01:35:48,390 day that we spent I was talking to other
01:35:48,400 → 01:35:51,110 people. That that No, you don't have
01:35:51,120 → 01:35:52,590 time for that, right? You don't have
01:35:52,600 → 01:35:55,070 time for Heraclitus. She has got to
01:35:55,080 → 01:35:58,030 understand what a participle is. We've
01:35:58,040 → 01:36:00,830 got to get that down. So
Section 263: 01:36:00,840 – 01:36:34,190
01:36:01,480 → 01:36:04,230 Yeah, so what I'm Yeah, anyhow, I've got
01:36:04,240 → 01:36:06,350 to I've got to try to cram some in
01:36:06,360 → 01:36:08,390 somewhere, but the book is going to be
01:36:08,400 → 01:36:10,110 doing that. You noticed today that we
01:36:10,120 → 01:36:11,830 read so long
01:36:11,840 → 01:36:14,270 with the guy who's I'm aging as I age,
01:36:14,280 → 01:36:17,350 I'm learning lots of things always.
01:36:17,360 → 01:36:18,950 That guy
01:36:18,960 → 01:36:21,590 That's real Greek and it's a real person
01:36:21,600 → 01:36:23,510 that was really significant in ancient
01:36:24,520 → 01:36:27,110 So, you know, you're We're going to be
01:36:27,120 → 01:36:31,550 doing more readings from the chapter. So
01:36:31,560 → 01:36:34,190 get ready next time if you want as you
Section 264: 01:36:34,200 – 01:37:07,550
01:36:34,200 → 01:36:36,310 So you'll do a few more examples from
01:36:36,320 → 01:36:38,750 this chapter from the exercise, then you
01:36:38,760 → 01:36:41,710 go right into the next unit. You'll read
01:36:41,720 → 01:36:43,710 the next unit. Just casually read it
01:36:43,720 → 01:36:45,470 just to get
01:36:45,480 → 01:36:49,230 a general view of it. And this time
01:36:49,240 → 01:36:52,030 instead of looking at the exercises, I
01:36:52,040 → 01:36:54,710 want you to go to the real Greek that's
01:36:54,720 → 01:36:56,550 at the end of the chapter. It's always
01:36:56,560 → 01:36:58,030 after the vocabulary and everything.
01:36:58,040 → 01:37:00,270 It's right at the end of the chapter.
01:37:00,280 → 01:37:03,670 Okay, that. Pick one or two of those
01:37:03,680 → 01:37:04,910 selections that you're going to
01:37:04,920 → 01:37:07,550 translate to me and let's do that cuz
Section 265: 01:37:07,560 – 01:37:39,440
01:37:07,560 → 01:37:09,630 that way you're at least reading real
01:37:10,920 → 01:37:12,950 Yeah. Okay?
01:37:14,040 → 01:37:15,550 All right, good good. I'll let you go. I
01:37:15,560 → 01:37:16,990 know it's late there. I'm sorry to keep
01:37:17,000 → 01:37:18,430 the kids up. I hope I didn't keep your
01:37:18,440 → 01:37:20,710 kids up or anything like that. No
01:37:20,720 → 01:37:22,950 sleeping. I hope I thank you for coming
01:37:22,960 → 01:37:24,830 on Lady Babylon and I hope you have a
01:37:24,840 → 01:37:27,550 great weekend. I hope it's restful and
01:37:27,560 → 01:37:30,030 you get some time to yourself.
01:37:30,040 → 01:37:32,990 Thank you. Yeah. Thank you, doc. Thank
01:37:33,000 → 01:37:34,590 you, Magdalena.
01:37:34,600 → 01:37:37,150 Thank you. Nice job, guys.