Aion (αἰών) - an experiential or transcendent state in which an individual steps outside the normal flow of time, often through altered states of consciousness. It is a timeless, mystical realm or condition where the individual gains access to knowledge or wisdom beyond the limitations of ordinary perception. Aion in this sense is not just a period of time (like an age or era) but a realm of existence that transcends chronological time. It represents a divine or otherworldly experience, where one can receive visions, insights, or revelations from outside the constraints of normal time. In the context of a pharmakomantis (drug seer), to be “in the Aion” is to enter a state of heightened perception or spiritual ecstasy, where one may perceive visions of the past, present, or future, often with the guidance or influence of substances that alter the mind. This state is seen as being outside of normal, linear time and offers a broader, cosmic perspective on existence. Aion is a key concept in mystical and prophetic traditions, where time becomes fluid, and the individual attains access to divine or cosmic wisdom, often experienced as a direct, non-linear insight into the nature of existence.
Stabilized aionic life, is non-reactive continuity and sustained mental presence.


In Plotinus (Enneads III.7.3), aionios (αἰώνιος) and aidios (ἀΐδιος) must be distinct because Plotinus deliberately uses them side-by-side in the same sentence and then immediately asks whether they are identical or not. If αἰώνιος already meant ἀΐδιος, the question would be meaningless. Instead, Plotinus treats ἀϊδιότης as everlastingness—unbroken duration—while aion (αἰών) (and thus aionios αἰώνιος) names a mode of perception being outside duration altogether, the timeless perception from "presence" (which is a mentality), of the intelligible realm. The very grammar forces the distinction: aionios (αἰώνιος) describes how the intelligible world is present (perceived timelessly), while aidios (ἀΐδιος) describes that it does not cease (endlessly). Plotinus would not pose the problem unless the terms carried different ontological work, proving that αἰώνιος ≠ ἀΐδιος by usage, not assertion.
(3) Τί ἂν οὖν εἴη τοῦτο, καθ' ὃ τὸν κόσμον πάντα τὸν ἐκεῖ αἰώνιον λέγομεν καὶ ἀίδιον εἶναι, καὶ τί ἡ ἀιδιότης, εἴτε ταὐτὸν καὶ ἡ αὐτὴ τῷ αἰῶνι, εἴτε κατ' αὐτὴν ὁ αἰών;